Abstract
Paecilomyces lilacinus, Bacillus subtilis and green manuring with Eicchornia crassipes were used alone and in combination for the management of Meloidogyne incognita on tomato. Treatment of P. lilacinus to M. incognita inoculated plants caused greater plant growth than B. subtilis or E. crassipes. Use of B. subtilis plus P. lilacinus plus E. crassipes. The use of both biocontrol agents along with a green manure of E. crassipes resulted in greatest plant growth of M. incognita inoculated plants. Treatment of B. subtilis plus E. crassipes resulted in less growth of M. incognita inoculated plants compared to any other combined treatment of management agents.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Paecilomyces lilacinus produced greater growth of infected tomato plants than Bacillus subtilis.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- P. lilacinuse0
- Interactor
- M. incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pest - Second interactor
- P. lilacinus
Purpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- B. subtilise0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Treatment of P. lilacinus to M. incognita inoculated plants caused greater plant growth than B. subtilis or E. crassipes”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Paecilomyces lilacinus produced greater growth of infected tomato plants than Eicchornia crassipes green manure.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- P. lilacinuse0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Second interactor
- P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- E. crassipese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment of P. lilacinus to M. incognita inoculated plants caused greater plant growth than B. subtilis or E. crassipes”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Both biocontrol agents plus E. crassipes manure produced greatest growth of infected tomato plants.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- both biocontrol agents along with a green manure of E. crassipese0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of both biocontrol agents along with a green manure of E. crassipes resulted in greatest plant growth of M. incognita inoculated plants”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
B. subtilis plus E. crassipes gave less growth than other combined treatments.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- B. subtilis plus E. crassipese0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Second interactor
- B. subtilis
Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- growth of M. incognita inoculated plantse0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- any other combined treatment of management agentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment of B. subtilis plus E. crassipes resulted in less growth of M. incognita inoculated plants compared to any other combined treatment of management agents”
t0“TOMATO”
The same questions in other papers
Bacillus subtilis · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
28 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →biocontrol · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →fertilization · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.