Paper · 2005 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Effect of cropping sequences and ploughing on plant parasitic nematodes and plant growth in field

Abdul Hamid Wani

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Significant reduction in the population of nematodes were recorded due to combined effect of cropping sequences and ploughing in different seasons, resulting in improved plant growth of all the test crops viz. wheat, chilli, mustard, mung, lentil, cowpea, chickpea, okra and tomato. The cropping sequence wheat-chilli-fallow caused greatest reduction in nematode populations. It was followed by lentil-cowpea-mung, chickpea-okra-chilli, mustard-mung-tomato and tomato-fallow-okra. Fallowing after tomato and chilli in the 2nd and 3rd season of cropping sequence decreased the population of nematodes. The different crops involved in the cropping sequences when grown in the following season after other test crops showed better improvement than crops grown in the first season. Deep ploughing proved more effective than normal ploughing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined cropping sequence and ploughing significantly reduced nematode populations.

Taxon
plantt0
Treatment
cropping sequences and ploughinge0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0parasite
Outcome
population of nematodese0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Significant reduction in the population of nematodes were recorded due to combined effect of cropping sequences and ploughing in different seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined cropping sequence and ploughing improved growth of all tested crops.

Taxon
wheat, chilli, mustard, mung, lentil, cowpea, chickpea, okra and tomatoe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in improved plant growth of all the test crops viz. wheat, chilli, mustard, mung, lentil, cowpea, chickpea, okra and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-chilli-fallow caused the greatest nematode population reduction.

Treatment
wheat-chilli-fallowe0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0parasite
Outcome
nematode populationse0
Direction
greatest reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cropping sequence wheat-chilli-fallow caused greatest reduction in nematode populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallowing after tomato and chilli decreased nematode populations.

Taxon
tomato and chillie0
Treatment
Fallowing after tomato and chillie0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0parasite
Outcome
population of nematodese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fallowing after tomato and chilli in the 2nd and 3rd season of cropping sequence decreased the population of nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crops grown after other test crops improved more than first-season crops.

Taxon
plantt0
Treatment
grown in the following season after other test cropse0
Outcome
better improvemente0
Direction
better improvemente0
Comparator
crops grown in the first seasone0

Verbatim

e0

“The different crops involved in the cropping sequences when grown in the following season after other test crops showed better improvement than crops grown in the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep ploughing was more effective than normal ploughing.

Taxon
plantt0
Treatment
Deep ploughinge0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
normal ploughinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Deep ploughing proved more effective than normal ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–97 · show in text ↑

rotation · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.