Paper · 2013 · Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika

Effect of irrigation methods and mulching on yield of okra in ber based vegetable production system underarid region

BIRBAL BIRBAL; Vijay Singh Rathore; N. S. Nathawat; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment entitled “Effect of irrigation methods and mulching on yield of okra in Ber based vegetable production system under arid region was conducted at CAZRI RRS, Bikaner during the year 2009 and 2010. Resulls of experiment indicated that yield of okra was significantly influenced by irrigation, mulch and their interaction effect. During the year 2009 and 2010 drip irrigation recorded 13.6 and 14.8 percent higher yield in comparison to flood irrigation method. Based on two year average data, use of plastic mulch, hessian cloth and indigenous mulch increased 44.6, 30.9 and 22.0 percent yield over no mulch. Maximum yield was recorded with combination of drip irrigation method and plastic mulch. In comparison to sole Ber higher survival percentage in growth was recorded under Ber+okra production system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation gave 13.6 and 14.8 percent higher okra yield than flood irrigation in 2009 and 2010.

Treatment
drip irrigatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
13.6 and 14.8 percente1
Comparator
flood irrigation methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“drip irrigation recorded 13.6 and 14.8 percent higher yield in comparison to flood irrigation method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch increased okra yield by 44.6 percent over no mulch (two-year average).

Treatment
plastic mulche2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
44.6e2
Comparator
no mulche2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–58 · show in text ↑
e2

“use of plastic mulch, hessian cloth and indigenous mulch increased 44.6, 30.9 and 22.0 percent yield over no mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hessian cloth mulch increased okra yield by 30.9 percent over no mulch (two-year average).

Treatment
hessian clothe2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
30.9e2
Comparator
no mulche2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–58 · show in text ↑
e2

“use of plastic mulch, hessian cloth and indigenous mulch increased 44.6, 30.9 and 22.0 percent yield over no mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indigenous mulch increased okra yield by 22.0 percent over no mulch (two-year average).

Treatment
indigenous mulche2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
22.0e2
Comparator
no mulche2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–58 · show in text ↑
e2

“use of plastic mulch, hessian cloth and indigenous mulch increased 44.6, 30.9 and 22.0 percent yield over no mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum okra yield was recorded with drip irrigation combined with plastic mulch.

Treatment
combination of drip irrigation method and plastic mulche3
Outcome
Maximum yielde3
Direction
Maximume3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–58 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum yield was recorded with combination of drip irrigation method and plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ber had higher survival percentage in the Ber+okra production system than sole Ber.

Treatment
Ber+okra production systeme4
Outcome
survival percentagee4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
sole Bere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In comparison to sole Ber higher survival percentage in growth was recorded under Ber+okra production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–817 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 48 positive, 15 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

mulching · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.