Paper · 2015 · Economic Affairs

Economically Viable STCR Based Nutrient Management on Soybean (Glycine max)

B.S. Dwivedi; R.K. Tiwari; A.K. Pandey; et al.

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soybean is the principle oil seed crop in India. Blanket recommendation of fertilizers for soybean over large area irrespective of soil type has lead to indiscriminate use of costly inputs. This has also resulted in imbalanced use of fertilizers and environment related problems. Hence to economize the fertilizer use soil testing should play important role. Therefore, a study on the soil test for improving soybean productivity was performed as a part of mandatory program of Agriculture Science Center, Rewa in Madhya Pradesh (MP) of India. Soils of study area had pH 6.8 to 7.4, EC 0.17 to 0.23 dSm−1, organic carbon 0.33 to 0.71%, available nitrogen 105 to 214 kg/ha, phosphorus 7.30 to 16.80 kg/ha and potassium 173 to 325 kg/ha. Experiment were conducted in rainy season of 2009–10 with two treatments, farmers practice -T1 (50 kg DAP/ha only) and application of fertilizer on the basis of soil test value -T2. Higher grain yield was observed in T2 (1830 kg/ha) than T1 (1180 kg/ha). The maximum increase in soybean yield was noted due to applied fertilizers on the basis of soil test values in T2. The highest Benefit Cost ratio (B:C ratio) 4.05 was registered in T2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-test-based fertilizer application yielded 1830 kg/ha soybean grain versus 1180 kg/ha with farmer practice.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
application of fertilizer on the basis of soil test value -T2e1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Value
1830 kg/hae0
Qualifier
1180 kg/hae0
Comparator
farmers practice -T1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher grain yield was observed in T2 (1830 kg/ha) than T1 (1180 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“farmers practice -T1 (50 kg DAP/ha only) and application of fertilizer on the basis of soil test value -T2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–916 · show in text ↑
e2

“soybean productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–429 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil-test-based fertilizer treatment achieved the highest benefit-cost ratio, 4.05.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
application of fertilizer on the basis of soil test value -T2e1
Outcome
Benefit Cost ratio (B:C ratio)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest Benefit Cost ratio (B:C ratio) 4.05 was registered in T2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of fertilizer on the basis of soil test value -T2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–916 · show in text ↑
e2

“soybean productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–429 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.