Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2012 on loamy sand soil to study the effect of vermicompost and biofertilizers on growth, yield and quality of cowpea. The experiment consisted of four treatments of vermicompost (control, 2.0, 4.0 and 6.0 t ha–1) and four treatment of biofertilizers (control, Rhizobium, PSB and Rhizobium + PSB) thereby making sixteen treatment combinations tested in randomized block design with four replications. Results indicated the application of vermicompost 4.0 t ha–1 maximum and significantly higher the net returns over other treatments and remained at par with 6.0 t ha–1 of vermicompost. However, seed, straw and biological yield, total root nodules and Leghaemoglobin content significantly increased upto 6.0 t ha–1 and remained at par with 4.0 t ha–1 of vermicompost over other treatments. But, application of vermicompost @ 6.0 t ha–1 significantly higher in case of protein content and effective root nodules over other treatments. The nitrogen fixation capacity unchanged under different levels of vermicompost. Results further indicated that seed inoculation with the Rhizobium + PSB significantly higher seed, straw and biological yield, protein content, total root nodules, effective root nodule, leghaemoglobin content, nitrogen capacity and net returns over control and other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost at 4.0 t ha–1 gave maximum net returns and was at par with 6.0 t ha–1.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- vermicompost 4.0 t ha–1e0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- at par with 6.0 t ha–1 of vermicomposte0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of vermicompost 4.0 t ha–1 maximum and significantly higher the net returns over other treatments and remained at par with 6.0 t ha–1 of vermicompost.”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost at 6.0 t ha–1 increased seed, straw and biological yield compared with other treatments and was at par with 4.0 t ha–1.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- 6.0 t ha–1e0
- Outcome
- seed, straw and biological yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- at par with 4.0 t ha–1e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed, straw and biological yield, total root nodules and Leghaemoglobin content significantly increased upto 6.0 t ha–1 and remained at par with 4.0 t ha–1 of vermicompost over other treatments.”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost increased total root nodules and leghaemoglobin content up to 6.0 t ha–1.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- 6.0 t ha–1e0
- Outcome
- total root nodules and Leghaemoglobin contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total root nodules and Leghaemoglobin content significantly increased upto 6.0 t ha–1 and remained at par with 4.0 t ha–1 of vermicompost over other treatments.”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost at 6.0 t ha–1 raised protein content and effective root nodules over other treatments.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- vermicompost @ 6.0 t ha–1e0
- Outcome
- protein content and effective root nodulese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of vermicompost @ 6.0 t ha–1 significantly higher in case of protein content and effective root nodules over other treatments.”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fixation capacity was unchanged across vermicompost levels.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- different levels of vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- nitrogen fixation capacitye0
- Direction
- unchangede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nitrogen fixation capacity unchanged under different levels of vermicompost.”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium plus PSB inoculation increased cowpea seed, straw and biological yields over control and other treatments.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- seed inoculation with the Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- seed, straw and biological yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- control and other treatmentse0
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed inoculation with the Rhizobium + PSB significantly higher seed, straw and biological yield, protein content, total root nodules, effective root nodule, leghaemoglobin content, nitrogen capacity and net returns over control and other treatments.”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium plus PSB inoculation increased protein content, nodules, leghaemoglobin, nitrogen capacity and net returns.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- seed inoculation with the Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- protein content, total root nodules, effective root nodule, leghaemoglobin content, nitrogen capacity and net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- control and other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed inoculation with the Rhizobium + PSB significantly higher seed, straw and biological yield, protein content, total root nodules, effective root nodule, leghaemoglobin content, nitrogen capacity and net returns over control and other treatments.”
t0“cowpea”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Rhizobium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
46 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
288 papers more in this group
See all 292 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.