Abstract
Summary Three cowpea cultivars were grown in the dry season on an inland valley swamp. Rice straw was used to mulch the plots and all seeds were pelleted with nitramolybdenum before planting. Fertilization with N, P and Mo and cultivar differences affected pod production and seed yield, but differences in plant population or inoculation with Rhizobium did not affect nodule weight, pod no. m −2 , pod weight or seed yield significantly. Seed yields of 0.91 t ha −1 from an improved cultivar and 0.83 t ha −1 from the local type were obtained. Even with heavy mulching there could be variations in seed yield in undeveloped inland valley swamps because of changes in microrelief.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization with N, P and Mo affected pod production and seed yield.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Treatment
- Fertilization with N, P and Moe0
- Outcome
- pod production and seed yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fertilization with N, P and Mo and cultivar differences affected pod production and seed yield”
e1“Three cowpea cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars differed in pod production and seed yield.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Outcome
- pod production and seed yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fertilization with N, P and Mo and cultivar differences affected pod production and seed yield”
e1“Three cowpea cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant population did not significantly affect nodule weight, pod number, pod weight, or seed yield.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Treatment
- differences in plant populatione0
- Outcome
- nodule weight, pod no. m −2 , pod weight or seed yielde0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“differences in plant population or inoculation with Rhizobium did not affect nodule weight, pod no. m −2 , pod weight or seed yield significantly”
e1“Three cowpea cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly affect nodule weight, pod number, pod weight, or seed yield.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Treatment
- inoculation with Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- nodule weight, pod no. m −2 , pod weight or seed yielde0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“inoculation with Rhizobium did not affect nodule weight, pod no. m −2 , pod weight or seed yield significantly”
e1“Three cowpea cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
An improved cultivar yielded 0.91 t ha −1.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Material
- improved cultivare0
- Outcome
- Seed yieldse0
- Value
- 0.91 t ha −1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Seed yields of 0.91 t ha −1 from an improved cultivar and 0.83 t ha −1 from the local type were obtained”
e1“Three cowpea cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
The local type yielded 0.83 t ha −1.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae1 - Material
- local typee0
- Outcome
- Seed yieldse0
- Value
- 0.83 t ha −1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Seed yields of 0.91 t ha −1 from an improved cultivar and 0.83 t ha −1 from the local type were obtained”
e1“Three cowpea cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →density · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.