Paper · 2006 · Agricultural science digest

Effect of seed priming with K2SO4 on germination and seedling growth in rice

B. Ramesh; Muneendra Kumar Singh

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A laboratory experiment on seed priming in rice with K2SO4 was conducted with four genotypes (Pusa Basmati-1, Basmati-385, Saket-4 and IR-36) and six concentrations of K2SO4 salt (0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, 4.0%, 8.0% and 16.0%) for 5 min, 30 min and 24 h durations. Data on the following quality parameters viz., root length, no. of roots/seedling, shoot length, fresh and dry weights of seedling and germination were recorded. Seed priming with K2SO4 for 24h was effective in enhancing germination and seedling growth. Significant differences were observed between genotypes due to K2SO4 priming. Among the four cultivars of rice tested, IR-36 was highly responsive to K2SO4 salt particularly at 1.0% concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming with K2SO4 for 24 h was effective in enhancing germination and seedling growth in rice.

Treatment
Seed priming with K2SO4 for 24he0
Outcome
germination and seedling growthe0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed priming with K2SO4 for 24h was effective in enhancing germination and seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant differences were observed between rice genotypes due to K2SO4 priming.

Outcome
Significant differences were observed between genotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were observed between genotypes due to K2SO4 priming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among four rice cultivars, IR-36 was highly responsive to K2SO4 priming, particularly at 1.0% concentration.

Material
IR-36e0
Treatment
K2SO4 salt particularly at 1.0% concentratione0
Outcome
highly responsivee0
Direction
highly responsivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the four cultivars of rice tested, IR-36 was highly responsive to K2SO4 salt particularly at 1.0% concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–707 · show in text ↑

potassium sulfate · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

245 papers: 230 positive, 15 negative or no effect

229 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

241 papers more in this group

See all 245 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.