Paper · 2015 · BIOINFOLET - A Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences

Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on yield and quality of onion (CV.N-53).

V. P. Kamble; G. R. Munde; R. M. Dheware

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Significant effect of Organic and Inorganic fertilizers was observed on weight of onion bulb (171.80g), weight of bulb (167.17 g), yield per plot (22.56 kg) and yield per hectare (67.16T), due to the application of 50%RDF + 50% poultry manure. Higher values of total soluble solids (14.79° brix), ascorbic acid (12.47%), reducing sugar (3.03%), Non reducing sugar (4.845%) and total sugar (7.87%) contents were observed due to the application of 75% RDF +25% poultry manure. During storage, lowest rotting (4.19%), PLW (7.11%) and total loss (11.31%) was observed when 50% RDF + 50% vermicompost was applied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% RDF plus poultry manure treatment produced 171.80g onion bulb weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50%RDF + 50% poultry manuree0
Outcome
weight of onion bulbe0
Value
171.80ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight of onion bulb (171.80g), weight of bulb (167.17 g), yield per plot (22.56 kg) and yield per hectare (67.16T), due to the application of 50%RDF + 50% poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–243 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced 167.17 g bulb weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50%RDF + 50% poultry manuree0
Outcome
weight of bulbe0
Value
167.17 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight of bulb (167.17 g), yield per plot (22.56 kg) and yield per hectare (67.16T), due to the application of 50%RDF + 50% poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–243 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment yielded 22.56 kg per plot.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50%RDF + 50% poultry manuree0
Outcome
yield per plote0
Value
22.56 kge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield per plot (22.56 kg) and yield per hectare (67.16T), due to the application of 50%RDF + 50% poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–243 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment yielded 67.16T per hectare.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50%RDF + 50% poultry manuree0
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Value
67.16Te0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield per hectare (67.16T), due to the application of 50%RDF + 50% poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–243 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF treatment yielded higher soluble solids of 14.79° brix.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF +25% poultry manuree0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
Highere0
Value
14.79° brixe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of total soluble solids (14.79° brix), ascorbic acid (12.47%), reducing sugar (3.03%), Non reducing sugar (4.845%) and total sugar (7.87%) contents were observed due to the application of 75% RDF +25% poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment yielded higher ascorbic acid of 12.47%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF +25% poultry manuree0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
Highere0
Value
12.47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of total soluble solids (14.79° brix), ascorbic acid (12.47%), reducing sugar (3.03%), Non reducing sugar (4.845%) and total sugar (7.87%) contents were observed due to the application of 75% RDF +25% poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment yielded higher reducing sugar of 3.03%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF +25% poultry manuree0
Outcome
reducing sugare0
Direction
Highere0
Value
3.03%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of total soluble solids (14.79° brix), ascorbic acid (12.47%), reducing sugar (3.03%), Non reducing sugar (4.845%) and total sugar (7.87%) contents were observed due to the application of 75% RDF +25% poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment yielded higher nonreducing sugar of 4.845%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF +25% poultry manuree0
Outcome
Non reducing sugare0
Direction
Highere0
Value
4.845%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of total soluble solids (14.79° brix), ascorbic acid (12.47%), reducing sugar (3.03%), Non reducing sugar (4.845%) and total sugar (7.87%) contents were observed due to the application of 75% RDF +25% poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment yielded higher total sugar of 7.87%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% RDF +25% poultry manuree0
Outcome
total sugare0
Direction
Highere0
Value
7.87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of total soluble solids (14.79° brix), ascorbic acid (12.47%), reducing sugar (3.03%), Non reducing sugar (4.845%) and total sugar (7.87%) contents were observed due to the application of 75% RDF +25% poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% RDF plus vermicompost treatment minimized rotting to 4.19%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50% RDF + 50% vermicomposte0
Outcome
rottinge0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During storage, lowest rotting (4.19%), PLW (7.11%) and total loss (11.31%) was observed when 50% RDF + 50% vermicompost was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment minimized PLW to 7.11%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50% RDF + 50% vermicomposte0
Outcome
PLWe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
7.11%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During storage, lowest rotting (4.19%), PLW (7.11%) and total loss (11.31%) was observed when 50% RDF + 50% vermicompost was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment minimized total loss to 11.31%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50% RDF + 50% vermicomposte0
Outcome
total losse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
11.31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During storage, lowest rotting (4.19%), PLW (7.11%) and total loss (11.31%) was observed when 50% RDF + 50% vermicompost was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.