Abstract
In a field experiment conducted during 2004 and 2005, application of 75 kg N ha−1 through chemical fertilizer + 25 kg N ha−1 through FYM or castor cake recorded significantly higher green forage yield and crude protein content of forage sorghum than the other treatments. Application of 100% N through organic manures (50 kg N ha−1 through FYM + 50 kg N ha−1 through castor cake) was significantly inferior in forage production, but could significantly increase the available N content and microbial count in the soil as compared to 100% N through chemical fertilizer. The maximum green forage and crude protein content of forage sorghum as well as available N content in the soil were recorded under Azotobacter + Azospirillum inoculation, although the effect on green forage yield was non-significant. The Azotobacter and Azospirillum counts were increased significantly under Azotobacter and Azospirillum inoculation treatments, respectively, while no bio-fertilizer inoculation recorded significantly lower values of soil available N as well as Azotobacter and Azospirillum population. Integration of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with bio-fertilizer inoculation increased the Azotobacter and Azospirillum population in the soil rhizosphere during both the years and enhanced the soil available N status in 2004. Application of 100% N through organic manure and dual inoculation of Azotobacter and Azospirillum registered the highest Azotobacter and Azospirillum population.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical fertilizer plus FYM gave significantly higher green forage yield than other treatments.
Verbatim
e0“application of 75 kg N ha−1 through chemical fertilizer + 25 kg N ha−1 through FYM or castor cake recorded significantly higher green forage yield and crude protein content of forage sorghum than the other treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical fertilizer plus castor cake gave significantly higher green forage yield than other treatments.
Verbatim
e0“application of 75 kg N ha−1 through chemical fertilizer + 25 kg N ha−1 through FYM or castor cake recorded significantly higher green forage yield and crude protein content of forage sorghum than the other treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixed chemical and organic N applications significantly increased crude protein content against other treatments.
Verbatim
e0“application of 75 kg N ha−1 through chemical fertilizer + 25 kg N ha−1 through FYM or castor cake recorded significantly higher green forage yield and crude protein content of forage sorghum than the other treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Full organic N was significantly inferior for forage production.
- Treatment
- 100% N through organic manures (50 kg N ha−1 through FYM + 50 kg N ha−1 through castor cake)e0
- Outcome
- forage productione0
- Direction
- inferiore0
SorghumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100% N through organic manures (50 kg N ha−1 through FYM + 50 kg N ha−1 through castor cake) was significantly inferior in forage production”
t0“Forage Yield of Multicut Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Full organic N increased soil available N relative to full chemical N.
- Treatment
- 100% N through organic manurese1
- Outcome
- available N contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 100% N through chemical fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“could significantly increase the available N content and microbial count in the soil as compared to 100% N through chemical fertilizer.”
t0“Effect of Integrated Nitrogen Management on Forage Yield of Multicut Sorghum”
e1“Application of 100% N through organic manures (50 kg N ha−1 through FYM + 50 kg N ha−1 through castor cake) was significantly inferior in forage production”
Claim · model-written summary
Full organic N increased soil microbial count relative to full chemical N.
- Treatment
- 100% N through organic manurese1
- Outcome
- microbial count in the soile0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 100% N through chemical fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“could significantly increase the available N content and microbial count in the soil as compared to 100% N through chemical fertilizer.”
t0“Effect of Integrated Nitrogen Management on Forage Yield of Multicut Sorghum”
e1“Application of 100% N through organic manures (50 kg N ha−1 through FYM + 50 kg N ha−1 through castor cake) was significantly inferior in forage production”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter plus Azospirillum inoculation gave maximum green forage yield, without a significant effect.
- Taxon
- forage sorghume0
- Treatment
- Azotobacter + Azospirillum inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- Azospirillum
Azospirillume0symbiont - Outcome
- green foragee0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum green forage and crude protein content of forage sorghum as well as available N content in the soil were recorded under Azotobacter + Azospirillum inoculation, although the effect on green forage yield was non-significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation produced maximum forage crude protein content.
- Taxon
- forage sorghume0
- Treatment
- Azotobacter + Azospirillum inoculatione0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- crude protein contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum green forage and crude protein content of forage sorghum as well as available N content in the soil were recorded under Azotobacter + Azospirillum inoculation, although the effect on green forage yield was non-significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation produced maximum soil available N.
- Taxon
- forage sorghume0
- Treatment
- Azotobacter + Azospirillum inoculatione0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- available N content in the soile0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum green forage and crude protein content of forage sorghum as well as available N content in the soil were recorded under Azotobacter + Azospirillum inoculation, although the effect on green forage yield was non-significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter inoculation significantly raised Azotobacter counts.
- Treatment
- Azotobacter and Azospirillum inoculation treatmentse0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- Azotobacter and Azospirillum countse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Azotobacter and Azospirillum counts were increased significantly under Azotobacter and Azospirillum inoculation treatments, respectively”
t0“Forage Yield of Multicut Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Azospirillum inoculation significantly raised Azospirillum counts.
- Treatment
- Azotobacter and Azospirillum inoculation treatmentse0
- Interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- Azospirillum countse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Azotobacter and Azospirillum counts were increased significantly under Azotobacter and Azospirillum inoculation treatments, respectively”
t0“Forage Yield of Multicut Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
No biofertilizer inoculation gave significantly lower soil available N.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no bio-fertilizer inoculation recorded significantly lower values of soil available N as well as Azotobacter and Azospirillum population.”
t0“Forage Yield of Multicut Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
No biofertilizer inoculation gave significantly lower Azotobacter and Azospirillum populations.
- Treatment
- no bio-fertilizer inoculatione0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- Azotobacter and Azospirillum populatione0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no bio-fertilizer inoculation recorded significantly lower values of soil available N as well as Azotobacter and Azospirillum population.”
t0“Forage Yield of Multicut Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated organic and inorganic fertilizers with inoculation raised rhizosphere Azotobacter and Azospirillum populations in both years.
- Treatment
- Integration of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with bio-fertilizer inoculatione0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- Azotobacter and Azospirillum population in the soil rhizospheree0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Integration of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with bio-fertilizer inoculation increased the Azotobacter and Azospirillum population in the soil rhizosphere during both the years”
t0“Forage Yield of Multicut Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated fertilizers and inoculation enhanced soil available N in 2004.
- Treatment
- Integration of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with bio-fertilizer inoculatione1
- Outcome
- soil available N statuse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Qualifier
- 2004e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“enhanced the soil available N status in 2004.”
t0“Effect of Integrated Nitrogen Management on Forage Yield of Multicut Sorghum”
e1“Integration of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with bio-fertilizer inoculation increased the Azotobacter and Azospirillum population in the soil rhizosphere during both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
Full organic N with dual inoculation yielded the highest Azotobacter and Azospirillum populations.
- Treatment
- 100% N through organic manure and dual inoculation of Azotobacter and Azospirillume0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- Azotobacter and Azospirillum populatione0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100% N through organic manure and dual inoculation of Azotobacter and Azospirillum registered the highest Azotobacter and Azospirillum population.”
t0“Forage Yield of Multicut Sorghum”
The same questions in other papers
Azospirillum · pest · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Azotobacter · pest · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Azotobacter · nutrient: content · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Azospirillum · organism · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Azospirillum · nutrient: content · SorghumResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Azotobacter · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Azospirillum · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
nitrogen · quality: protein · SorghumResults differ
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →8 of 21 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.