Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Performance of maize (Zea mays)-based intercropping systems and their residual effect on wheat (Triticum aestivum) + lentil (Lens culinaris) intercropping system under organic conditions

SHILPA KAUSHAL; RAMESHWAR; J.P. SAINI; et al.

15
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on a silty clay loam soil of Palampur during 201112 and 201213, to study performance of maize (Zea mays L.)-based intercropping systems and their residual effect on wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol.] + lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) intercropping under organic conditions. Growth, yield attributes, grain and stover yields of maize were more in sole stand. Intercropping systems resulted in significantly higher grain-maize-equivalent yield than sole stand. Maize + soybean (Glycine max) in both addi- tive and paired series resulted in higher maize-equivalent yield than the other intercrops and resulted in better yield of both maize and soybean crops and proved to be the best intercropping system with a net returns of 68,807 and 65,078 and net returns/rupee invested of 1.13 and 1.08 respectively. However, wheat and lentil on residual basis showed more yield on intercropping treatment than sole maize. Wheat recorded the highest yield when sown under soybean and ricebean treatment both in additive and paired series, whereas lentil recorded the highest grain yield when sown under asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) additive series and was statistically at par with cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in paired series. The highest available nitrogen was recorded in maize + soybean in paired and additive series, whereas the lowest available nitrogen in sole maize. Among the intercrops, soybean fixed more N followed by ricebean (Vigna umbellata), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis). Higher values of available Phosphorus (10.5 kg/ha) and Potassium (228.1 kg/ha) was recorded in sole maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had greater growth, yield attributes and grain and stover yields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Growth, yield attributes, grain and stover yieldse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
sole stande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth, yield attributes, grain and stover yields of maize were more in sole stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly increased grain maize equivalent yield over sole stand.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Intercropping systemse0
Outcome
grain-maize-equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole stande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping systems resulted in significantly higher grain-maize-equivalent yield than sole stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize plus soybean had higher maize equivalent yield than other intercrops.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Maize + soybeane0
Outcome
maize-equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the other intercropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize + soybean (Glycine max) in both addi- tive and paired series resulted in higher maize-equivalent yield than the other intercrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize plus soybean produced better yields of both crops.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Maize + soybeane1
Outcome
yield of both maize and soybean cropse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in better yield of both maize and soybean crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)-based”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize + soybean (Glycine max) in both addi- tive and paired series resulted in higher maize-equivalent yield than the other intercrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–643 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize plus soybean intercropping gave net returns of 68,807 and 65,078 in additive and paired series.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
68,807 and 65,078e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns of 68,807 and 65,078 and net returns/rupee invested of 1.13 and 1.08 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)-based”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize plus soybean gave net returns per rupee invested of 1.13 and 1.08.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
net returns/rupee investede0
Value
1.13 and 1.08e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns/rupee invested of 1.13 and 1.08 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)-based”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual wheat yield was higher after intercropping than sole maize.

Treatment
intercropping treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
sole maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat and lentil on residual basis showed more yield on intercropping treatment than sole maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual lentil yield was higher after intercropping than sole maize.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
intercropping treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
sole maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat and lentil on residual basis showed more yield on intercropping treatment than sole maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was highest after soybean and ricebean treatments.

Treatment
soybean and ricebean treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat recorded the highest yield when sown under soybean and ricebean treatment both in additive and paired series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil grain yield was highest after asparagus bean additive series.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) additive seriese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lentil recorded the highest grain yield when sown under asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) additive series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil grain yield after cowpea paired series was statistically at par with asparagus bean additive series.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in paired seriese0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
at pare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was statistically at par with cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in paired series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil recorded the highest grain yield when sown under asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) additive series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available nitrogen was highest with maize plus soybean and lowest with sole maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize + soybeane0
Outcome
available nitrogene0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
sole maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest available nitrogen was recorded in maize + soybean in paired and additive series, whereas the lowest available nitrogen in sole maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1440 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean fixed more nitrogen than ricebean, cowpea and asparagus bean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
fixed more Ne0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
ricebeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean fixed more N followed by ricebean (Vigna umbellata), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1604 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available phosphorus was higher in sole maize at 10.5 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
available Phosphoruse0
Direction
Highere0
Value
10.5 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of available Phosphorus (10.5 kg/ha) and Potassium (228.1 kg/ha) was recorded in sole maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1711 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available potassium was higher in sole maize at 228.1 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Potassiume0
Direction
Highere0
Value
228.1 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of available Phosphorus (10.5 kg/ha) and Potassium (228.1 kg/ha) was recorded in sole maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1711 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

189 papers: 131 positive, 58 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

intercropping · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 23 positive, 11 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.