Abstract
A study was carried out to investigate the effect of chemical treatments and sucrose on vase life of three new rose cultivars, ‘Bouing’, ‘Creamly’ and ‘Sena’. Treatments were included distilled water (control), 10 g l -1 sucrose, 10 g l -1 sucrose + 100 mg l -1 citric acid, 10 g L -1 sucrose + 100 mg l -1 aluminium sulphate, 10 g l -1 sucrose + 0.5 mM silver thiosulphate for 2 h . Results showed that the best treatment for ‘Sena’ was silver thiosulphate + sucrose that increased fresh weight, water uptake, flower diameter and flower vase life. On the other hand, this treatment caused petal burning in ‘Creamly’ in spite of its other improved traits. Best treatment for other cultivars was citric acid + sucrose that had significant effect on all investigated factors. Aluminium sulphate just had a positive effect on ‘Sena’. This treatment did not have positive effect in ‘Creamly’ and even decreased vase life of ‘Bouing’ in comparison with control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Silver thiosulphate + sucrose increased fresh weight, water uptake and flower diameter of cut rose cultivar Sena.
- Taxon
- Roset0
- Material
- Senae1
- Treatment
- silver thiosulphate + sucrosee1
- Outcome
- fresh weight, water uptake, flower diametere1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Three Cut Rose Cultivars”
e1“Results showed that the best treatment for ‘Sena’ was silver thiosulphate + sucrose that increased fresh weight, water uptake, flower diameter and flower vase life”
Claim · model-written summary
Silver thiosulphate + sucrose increased flower vase life of cut rose cultivar Sena.
- Taxon
- Roset0
- Material
- Senae1
- Treatment
- silver thiosulphate + sucrosee1
- Outcome
- flower vase lifee1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Three Cut Rose Cultivars”
e1“Results showed that the best treatment for ‘Sena’ was silver thiosulphate + sucrose that increased fresh weight, water uptake, flower diameter and flower vase life”
Claim · model-written summary
Silver thiosulphate + sucrose caused petal burning in cut rose cultivar Creamly despite its other improved traits.
- Taxon
- Roset0
- Material
- Creamlye2
- Treatment
- silver thiosulphate + sucrosee1
- Outcome
- petal burninge2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Qualifier
- in spite of its other improved traitse2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Three Cut Rose Cultivars”
e1“Results showed that the best treatment for ‘Sena’ was silver thiosulphate + sucrose that increased fresh weight, water uptake, flower diameter and flower vase life”
e2“this treatment caused petal burning in ‘Creamly’ in spite of its other improved traits”
Claim · model-written summary
Citric acid + sucrose was the best treatment for the other cultivars and had a significant effect on all investigated factors.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“Three Cut Rose Cultivars”
e3“Best treatment for other cultivars was citric acid + sucrose that had significant effect on all investigated factors”
Claim · model-written summary
Aluminium sulphate had a positive effect on cut rose cultivar Sena.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Three Cut Rose Cultivars”
e4“Aluminium sulphate just had a positive effect on ‘Sena’”
Claim · model-written summary
Aluminium sulphate did not have a positive effect on cut rose cultivar Creamly.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“Three Cut Rose Cultivars”
e4“Aluminium sulphate just had a positive effect on ‘Sena’”
e5“This treatment did not have positive effect in ‘Creamly’”
Claim · model-written summary
Aluminium sulphate decreased vase life of cut rose cultivar Bouing compared with control.
Verbatim
t0“Three Cut Rose Cultivars”
e4“Aluminium sulphate just had a positive effect on ‘Sena’”
e6“even decreased vase life of ‘Bouing’ in comparison with control”
The same questions in other papers
aluminium atom · quality: postharvest · RosaPositive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →sulfate · quality: postharvest · RosaPositive and negative results
8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →sucrose · quality: postharvest · RosaPositive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →sucrose · physiology: water · RosaResults agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →silver atom · quality: postharvest · RosaResults agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.