Abstract
Integration of legume trees as hedgerows in cassava (Manihot utilisima Crantz) farming is one possibility to reduce the negative effect of cassava farming on soil productivity. The experiment was conducted in the Tamanbogo Experimental Farm in East Lampung from November 2006 to November 2008, located at 050 00’ 20” S and 1050 29’ 23” E. The field experiment had three factors of legumes hedgerow, and three factors of P fertilizer rates that were arranged in a split plot experimental design. The results showed that the total biomass of legumes tree pruning in 2007 and 2008 were not affected by P fertilization on cassava but it was affected significantly by the variety of legumes tree planted as hedgerows. The rates of P fertilization on cassava did not effect significantly on soil chemical characteristic in 2007 but it’s tend to increase in 2008. Flemingia congesta hedgerows gave a significant lower soil bulk density and highest total soil pores space in 2008. The highest yield of fresh cassava (19.98 t ha-1) was gained on Flemingia congesta hedgerows. Increasing the rates of P fertilizer from 36 to 72 kg P2O5 ha-1 increased the yield of cassava significantly in 2008.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
P fertilization did not affect legume pruning biomass.
- Taxon
- cassava
Manihot esculentae0 - Treatment
- P fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- total biomass of legumes tree pruninge0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the total biomass of legumes tree pruning in 2007 and 2008 were not affected by P fertilization on cassava”
Claim · model-written summary
Hedgerow variety significantly affected legume pruning biomass.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Material
- legumes treee0
- Outcome
- total biomass of legumes tree pruninge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the total biomass of legumes tree pruning in 2007 and 2008 were not affected by P fertilization on cassava but it was affected significantly by the variety of legumes tree planted as hedgerows”
Claim · model-written summary
P fertilization did not significantly affect soil chemical characteristics in 2007.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- P fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- soil chemical characteristice0
- Direction
- did not effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The rates of P fertilization on cassava did not effect significantly on soil chemical characteristic in 2007”
Claim · model-written summary
P fertilization tended to increase soil chemical characteristics in 2008.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- P fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- soil chemical characteristice0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The rates of P fertilization on cassava did not effect significantly on soil chemical characteristic in 2007 but it’s tend to increase in 2008”
Claim · model-written summary
Flemingia congesta hedgerows lowered soil bulk density significantly.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae1
- Treatment
- Flemingia congesta hedgerowse0
- Outcome
- soil bulk densitye0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Flemingia congesta hedgerows gave a significant lower soil bulk density”
e1“yield of fresh cassava”
Claim · model-written summary
Flemingia congesta hedgerows yielded the highest soil pore space.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae1
- Treatment
- Flemingia congesta hedgerowse0
- Outcome
- total soil pores spacee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Flemingia congesta hedgerows gave a significant lower soil bulk density and highest total soil pores space in 2008”
e1“yield of fresh cassava”
Claim · model-written summary
Cassava fresh yield reached 19.98 t ha-1 with Flemingia hedgerows.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- Flemingia congesta hedgerowse0
- Outcome
- yield of fresh cassavae0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 19.98 t ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield of fresh cassava (19.98 t ha-1) was gained on Flemingia congesta hedgerows.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing phosphorus fertilizer significantly raised cassava yield in 2008.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- rates of P fertilizer from 36 to 72 kg P2O5 ha-1e0
- Outcome
- yield of cassavae0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing the rates of P fertilizer from 36 to 72 kg P2O5 ha-1 increased the yield of cassava significantly in 2008.”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →fertilization · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
67 papers more in this group
See all 71 papers →fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
149 papers more in this group
See all 153 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.