Paper · 2004 · Legume Research - An International Journal

FERTLGATION FOR GREENGRAM THROUGH MICROSPRIRINKLERS

R.V. Selvi; P. Subramanian; S. Mahendran; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the influence of fertigation through microsprinklers on greengram. The results showed that fertigation given during flowering and 15 days there after significantly increased the growth and yield attributes of green gram besides increasing chlorophyll accumulation and nutrient uptake. Among the fertigation treatments, DAP+NM had given higher values of growth and yield attributes followed by DAP alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation during flowering and 15 days thereafter significantly increased growth and yield attributes of green gram in a field experiment.

Treatment
fertigation given during flowering and 15 days there aftere1
Outcome
growth and yield attributese1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the influence of fertigation through microsprinklers on greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertigation given during flowering and 15 days there after significantly increased the growth and yield attributes of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation during flowering and 15 days thereafter increased chlorophyll accumulation and nutrient uptake in green gram.

Treatment
fertigation given during flowering and 15 days there aftere1
Outcome
chlorophyll accumulation and nutrient uptakee2
Direction
increasinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“fertigation given during flowering and 15 days there after significantly increased the growth and yield attributes of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–261 · show in text ↑
e2

“besides increasing chlorophyll accumulation and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among fertigation treatments, DAP+NM gave higher growth and yield attributes of greengram than DAP alone.

Treatment
DAP+NMe3
Outcome
growth and yield attributese3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
DAP alonee3
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the influence of fertigation through microsprinklers on greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“DAP+NM had given higher values of growth and yield attributes followed by DAP alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–444 · show in text ↑

stage · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

stage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 22 positive, 8 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.