Abstract
A field study was carried out to find out the effect of different botanical pesticides and a chemical pesticide on the sucking pests of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum. Insitu count of leafhopper (Amrasca devastans) and aphids (Aphis gossypii) were made prior to the pesticide application and on 1st, 3rd, and 7th day after application of pesticides. Of the different botanicals used, neem seed kernel extract (5%) was found to be effective followed by Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%), neem oil (3%) and Pongamia glabra oil (3%) against the sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids) of cotton. Maximum population reduction was noticed on the 3rd day after treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Neem seed kernel extract at 5% was the most effective botanical against cotton sucking pests.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- neem seed kernel extract (5%)e0
- Interactor
- Leafhoppere0pest
- Second interactor
- AphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Outcome
- sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids)e0
- Direction
- effectivee0
- Comparator
- Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“neem seed kernel extract (5%) was found to be effective followed by Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%), neem oil (3%) and Pongamia glabra oil (3%) against the sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids) of cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Pongamia seed kernel extract at 5% ranked after neem seed kernel extract.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%)e0
- Interactor
- Leafhoppere0pest
- Second interactor
- AphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Outcome
- sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids)e0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- neem seed kernel extract (5%)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“neem seed kernel extract (5%) was found to be effective followed by Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%), neem oil (3%) and Pongamia glabra oil (3%) against the sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids) of cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil at 3% ranked after Pongamia seed kernel extract.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- neem oil (3%)e0
- Interactor
- Leafhoppere0pest
- Second interactor
- AphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Outcome
- sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids)e0
- Comparator
- Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%)e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%), neem oil (3%) and Pongamia glabra oil (3%) against the sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids) of cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Pongamia oil at 3% ranked after neem oil.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Pongamia glabra oil (3%)e0
- Interactor
- Leafhoppere0pest
- Second interactor
- AphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Outcome
- sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids)e0
- Comparator
- neem oil (3%)e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“neem oil (3%) and Pongamia glabra oil (3%) against the sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids) of cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Pest population reduction was greatest three days after treatment.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Outcome
- population reductione0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Qualifier
- 3rd day after treatmente0
Not reportedOrgan / stage
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maximum population reduction was noticed on the 3rd day after treatment.”
t0“sucking pests of cotton”
The same questions in other papers
Azadirachta indica · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →botanical · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.