Paper · 2011 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Efficacy of neem and pungam based botanical pesticides on sucking pests of cotton.

Jayaraj Vinodhini; Balasubramanian Malaikozhundan

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was carried out to find out the effect of different botanical pesticides and a chemical pesticide on the sucking pests of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum. Insitu count of leafhopper (Amrasca devastans) and aphids (Aphis gossypii) were made prior to the pesticide application and on 1st, 3rd, and 7th day after application of pesticides. Of the different botanicals used, neem seed kernel extract (5%) was found to be effective followed by Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%), neem oil (3%) and Pongamia glabra oil (3%) against the sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids) of cotton. Maximum population reduction was noticed on the 3rd day after treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem seed kernel extract at 5% was the most effective botanical against cotton sucking pests.

Treatment
neem seed kernel extract (5%)e0
Interactor
Leafhoppere0pest
Second interactor
AphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids)e0
Direction
effectivee0
Comparator
Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem seed kernel extract (5%) was found to be effective followed by Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%), neem oil (3%) and Pongamia glabra oil (3%) against the sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids) of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pongamia seed kernel extract at 5% ranked after neem seed kernel extract.

Treatment
Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%)e0
Interactor
Leafhoppere0pest
Second interactor
AphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids)e0
Direction
followed bye0
Comparator
neem seed kernel extract (5%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem seed kernel extract (5%) was found to be effective followed by Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%), neem oil (3%) and Pongamia glabra oil (3%) against the sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids) of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil at 3% ranked after Pongamia seed kernel extract.

Treatment
neem oil (3%)e0
Interactor
Leafhoppere0pest
Second interactor
AphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids)e0
Comparator
Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pongamia glabra seed kernel extract (5%), neem oil (3%) and Pongamia glabra oil (3%) against the sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids) of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pongamia oil at 3% ranked after neem oil.

Treatment
Pongamia glabra oil (3%)e0
Interactor
Leafhoppere0pest
Second interactor
AphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids)e0
Comparator
neem oil (3%)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem oil (3%) and Pongamia glabra oil (3%) against the sucking pests (Leafhopper and Aphids) of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–592 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pest population reduction was greatest three days after treatment.

Outcome
population reductione0
Direction
Maximume0
Qualifier
3rd day after treatmente0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum population reduction was noticed on the 3rd day after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“sucking pests of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–81 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.