Abstract
Efficacy of Caneplex, a micronutrient combina tion of c alcium, magnesium, molybdenum, manganese, zinc, copper, iron and sulphur, was tested during spring planting season in three consecutive years-2005-06, 2006–07 and 2007–08, on growth, yield and quality of sugarcane at the research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.) using the variety CoS 97264. Application of Caneplex enhanced the germination, shoot population, NMC and consequently the yield of sugarcane. The results showed that the germination was significantly increased by the application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30kg/ha as basal whereas top dressing of the same doses did not affect the germination significantly. Application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30kg/ha as basal followed by the same amount as top dressing showed significant increase in germination by about 4–5% over untreated control. Application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30 kg/ha as basal followed by the same amount of Caneplex as top dressing increased the shoot population and number of millable canes significantly as compared to control. The cane yield was marginally increased due to the application of Caneplex as basal or top dressing alone, the basal application being slightly better. A significant increase in cane yield was recorded after application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30 kg/ha as basal followed by the same amount of Caneplex as top dressing. Sucrose percent in juice at 10th month crop age was not affected significantly by the application of Caneplex at any dose under various treatments. Conclusively, the application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30 kg/ha as basal followed by the same amount of Caneplex as top dressing increased the cane yield significantly, however, Caneplex did not show significant effect on the cane quality (sucrose percent) at any dose under various methods ofapplication.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Caneplex at 25 or 30 kg/ha applied as basal significantly increased sugarcane germination.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Material
- CoS 97264e0
- Treatment
- application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30kg/ha as basale1
- Outcome
- germinatione1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.)e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane”
e0“at the research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.) using the variety CoS 97264”
e1“The results showed that the germination was significantly increased by the application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30kg/ha as basal whereas top dressing of the same doses did not affect the germination significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Top dressing of Caneplex at the same doses did not affect sugarcane germination significantly.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Material
- CoS 97264e0
- Treatment
- top dressing of the same dosese1
- Outcome
- germinatione1
- Direction
- did not affecte1
- Setting
- research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.)e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane”
e0“at the research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.) using the variety CoS 97264”
e1“The results showed that the germination was significantly increased by the application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30kg/ha as basal whereas top dressing of the same doses did not affect the germination significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Caneplex applied as basal followed by top dressing increased sugarcane germination by 4–5% over untreated control.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane”
e0“at the research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.) using the variety CoS 97264”
e2“Application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30kg/ha as basal followed by the same amount as top dressing showed significant increase in germination by about 4–5% over untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Caneplex applied as basal followed by top dressing significantly increased sugarcane shoot population and number of millable canes compared with control.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Material
- CoS 97264e0
- Treatment
- Application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30 kg/ha as basal followed by the same amount of Caneplex as top dressinge3
- Outcome
- shoot population and number of millable canese3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Comparator
- controle3
- Setting
- research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.)e0
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane”
e0“at the research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.) using the variety CoS 97264”
e3“Application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30 kg/ha as basal followed by the same amount of Caneplex as top dressing increased the shoot population and number of millable canes significantly as compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Caneplex applied as basal or as top dressing alone marginally increased sugarcane cane yield.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Material
- CoS 97264e0
- Treatment
- application of Caneplex as basal or top dressing alonee4
- Outcome
- cane yielde4
- Direction
- marginally increasede4
- Setting
- research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.)e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane”
e0“at the research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.) using the variety CoS 97264”
e4“The cane yield was marginally increased due to the application of Caneplex as basal or top dressing alone, the basal application being slightly better”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal application of Caneplex was slightly better than top dressing alone for sugarcane cane yield.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane”
e0“at the research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.) using the variety CoS 97264”
e4“The cane yield was marginally increased due to the application of Caneplex as basal or top dressing alone, the basal application being slightly better”
Claim · model-written summary
Caneplex applied as basal followed by the same amount as top dressing significantly increased sugarcane cane yield.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Material
- CoS 97264e0
- Treatment
- application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30 kg/ha as basal followed by the same amount of Caneplex as top dressinge5
- Outcome
- cane yielde5
- Direction
- increasee5
- Setting
- research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.)e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane”
e0“at the research farm of UP. Council of Sugarcane Research, Shahjahanpur (UP.) using the variety CoS 97264”
e5“A significant increase in cane yield was recorded after application of Caneplex @ 25 or 30 kg/ha as basal followed by the same amount of Caneplex as top dressing”
Claim · model-written summary
Caneplex at any dose under various treatments did not significantly affect sugarcane juice sucrose percent at the 10th month of crop age.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of Caneplex at any dose under various treatmentse6
- Outcome
- Sucrose percent in juicee6
- Direction
- not affectede6
- Qualifier
- at 10th month crop agee6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane”
e6“Sucrose percent in juice at 10th month crop age was not affected significantly by the application of Caneplex at any dose under various treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Caneplex showed no significant effect on sugarcane cane quality (sucrose percent) at any dose.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Caneplexe7
- Outcome
- cane quality (sucrose percent)e7
- Direction
- did not show significant effecte7
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane”
e7“Caneplex did not show significant effect on the cane quality (sucrose percent) at any dose”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.