Paper · 2010 · HortScience

How Salinity Affects Co2 Fixation by Horticultural Crops

César Mota-Cadenas; Carlos Alcaraz-López; M. Carmen Martínez-Ballesta; et al.

12
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

It has been recognized widely that sequestration of atmospheric CO 2 by terrestrial ecosystems can contribute significantly to the stabilization of atmospheric CO 2 . The carbon sequestration potential of crop lands should be considered as a modest but non-negligible contribution to climate change mitigation. Salinity is one of the most important environmental factors limiting crop production of marginal agricultural soils in many parts of the world. In our research, several physiological analyses were performed in atmospheric CO 2 , in daylight, both in normal conditions and with salinity (40 m m NaCl). Crops like melon or pepper showed significantly lower photosynthetic rates when they were grown in saline conditions. Also, the total chlorophyll content and carbon percentage were lower in the salinity-treated plants of these species. For lettuce, treated plants showed a significant decrease in photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll content, but there were no differences in carbon content. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the values of total chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, or carbon content for tomato and watermelon plants when control and NaCl-treated plants were compared. The mineral composition data showed greater increases of sodium in both roots and leaves of melon and pepper when plants were treated with NaCl compared with the rest of the species. In conclusion, tomato and watermelon seem to be more efficient in CO 2 fixation than the other crops of this experiment and this seems to be related to their greater salinity tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly lowered photosynthetic rates in melon.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
saline conditionse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crops like melon or pepper showed significantly lower photosynthetic rates when they were grown in saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly lowered photosynthetic rates in pepper.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
saline conditionse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Crops like melon or pepper showed significantly lower photosynthetic rates when they were grown in saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity lowered chlorophyll content and carbon percentage in melon.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe1
Treatment
salinity-treatede0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content and carbon percentagee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll content and carbon percentage were lower in the salinity-treated plants of these species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–846 · show in text ↑
e1

“melon or pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity lowered chlorophyll content and carbon percentage in pepper.

Taxon
peppere1
Treatment
salinity-treatede0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content and carbon percentagee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll content and carbon percentage were lower in the salinity-treated plants of these species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–846 · show in text ↑
e1

“melon or pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis and chlorophyll in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For lettuce, treated plants showed a significant decrease in photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity did not change carbon content in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
carbon contente0
Direction
no differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For lettuce, treated plants showed a significant decrease in photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll content, but there were no differences in carbon content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato showed no significant differences in chlorophyll, photosynthesis or carbon content under NaCl treatment.

Treatment
NaCl-treated plantse0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, or carbon contente0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences in the values of total chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, or carbon content for tomato and watermelon plants when control and NaCl-treated plants were compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon showed no significant differences in chlorophyll, photosynthesis or carbon content under NaCl treatment.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
NaCl-treated plantse0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, or carbon contente0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences in the values of total chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, or carbon content for tomato and watermelon plants when control and NaCl-treated plants were compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl caused greater sodium increases in melon roots and leaves than in the other species.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
NaCle0
Outcome
sodium in both roots and leavese0
Direction
greater increasese0
Comparator
rest of the speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater increases of sodium in both roots and leaves of melon and pepper when plants were treated with NaCl compared with the rest of the species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl caused greater sodium increases in pepper roots and leaves than in the other species.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
NaCle0
Outcome
sodium in both roots and leavese0
Direction
greater increasese0
Comparator
rest of the speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“greater increases of sodium in both roots and leaves of melon and pepper when plants were treated with NaCl compared with the rest of the species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1410 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato appeared more efficient in carbon fixation than the other crops.

Outcome
CO 2 fixatione0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
other cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato and watermelon seem to be more efficient in CO 2 fixation than the other crops of this experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1531 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon appeared more efficient in carbon fixation than the other crops.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome
CO 2 fixatione0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
other cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato and watermelon seem to be more efficient in CO 2 fixation than the other crops of this experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1531 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · physiology: photosynthesis · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sodium chloride · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

14 papers: 4 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.