Paper · 1996 · HortScience

MICROPROPAGATION OF FICUS BENJAMINA L. `VARIEGATA'

L. Agus Sukamto

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Shoot tip culture of Ficus benjamina L. `Variegata' produced multiple shoots on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with 1 μ m 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D), 1 μ m napthalene acetic acid (NAA), 1 μ m benzylaminopurine (BAP), l -proline at 2 mg·liter –1 , and l -glutamine at 1 mg·liter –1 without previously producing callus. Multiple shoots were more profuse on one-half MS medium with 4.44 μ m BAP. Single shoot of multiple shoots produced roots on one-half MS medium with NAA at 2.69 μ m . Leaf culture of the plant produced profuse calli on same media without plant regeneration. Calli subcultured on one-half MS or MS media with 1.7 μ m indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and 150 μ m 6-(y,y-dimethylallylamino)-purine (2iP) did not induce plant regeneration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot tips produced multiple shoots without callus on MS medium with specified regulators and amino acids.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina L.Ficus benjaminae0
Material
`Variegata'e0
Organ / stage
Shoot tipe0
Treatment
Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with 1 μ m 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D), 1 μ m napthalene acetic acid (NAA), 1 μ m benzylaminopurine (BAP), l -proline at 2 mg·liter –1 , and l -glutamine at 1 mg·liter –1e0
Outcome
multiple shootse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot tip culture of Ficus benjamina L. `Variegata' produced multiple shoots on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with 1 μ m 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D), 1 μ m napthalene acetic acid (NAA), 1 μ m benzylaminopurine (BAP), l -proline at 2 mg·liter –1 , and l -glutamine at 1 mg·liter –1 without previously producing callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots were more profuse on half-strength MS with 4.44 μm BAP.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina L.Ficus benjaminat0
Treatment
one-half MS medium with 4.44 μ m BAPe0
Outcome
Multiple shootse0
Direction
more profusee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multiple shoots were more profuse on one-half MS medium with 4.44 μ m BAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina L.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single shoots rooted on half-strength MS with 2.69 μm NAA.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina L.Ficus benjaminat0
Treatment
one-half MS medium with NAA at 2.69 μ me0
Outcome
produced rootse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single shoot of multiple shoots produced roots on one-half MS medium with NAA at 2.69 μ m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina L.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf culture produced abundant callus without plant regeneration.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina L.Ficus benjaminat0
Organ / stage
Leafe0
Outcome
profuse calli on same media without plant regeneratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf culture of the plant produced profuse calli on same media without plant regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina L.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus subcultured with IAA and 2iP did not regenerate plants.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina L.Ficus benjaminat0
Treatment
one-half MS or MS media with 1.7 μ m indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and 150 μ m 6-(y,y-dimethylallylamino)-purine (2iP)e0
Outcome
plant regeneratione0
Direction
did not inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calli subcultured on one-half MS or MS media with 1.7 μ m indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and 150 μ m 6-(y,y-dimethylallylamino)-purine (2iP) did not induce plant regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina L.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑

indole-3-acetic acid · growth · Ficus benjamina (weeping fig)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

in vitro · growth · Ficus benjamina (weeping fig)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.