Paper · 2007 · Horticultural Science and Technology

Effect of CO2 treatment on postharvest quality of 'Kurakatawase' peach fruits.

Choi Jeong-Hee; Lim Jeong-Ho; Moon-Cheol Jeong; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of high CO₂ pre-treatment on quality of ‘Kurakatawase’ peach fruits. High levels of CO₂ (60 and 100%) were applied on fruits at 20℃ for 3 and 6 h. Changes in factors of fruits quality, respiratory rate, ethylene production, decay, soluble solids content (SSC), and titratable acidity of fruits during shelf life at 20℃, were investigated. No significant differences in respiration rate, ethylene production, and hardness were observed between the high CO₂-treated and non-treated fruits during shelf life. Fruits quality parameters such as SSC and titratable acidity were higher in CO₂-treated fruits compared with non-treated fruits. The high CO₂ pre-treatments significantly reduced decay of fruits. Fruits treated with 60% CO₂ for 6 h showed the best score in sweetness and overal palatability. Treatment of 100% CO₂ for over 3 h, which showed inhibiting effect on the decay of fruits, accompanied off-flavor by residual CO₂ in flesh. Pre-treatment of 60% CO₂ for 6 h, therefore, could be used as a good control of postharvest quality of ‘Kurakatawase’ peach fruits without off-flavor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO₂ treatment showed no significant difference in respiration rate, ethylene production or hardness versus untreated fruit.

Treatment
high CO₂-treatede0
Outcome
respiration rate, ethylene production, and hardnesse0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Qualifier
during shelf lifee0
Comparator
non-treated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences in respiration rate, ethylene production, and hardness were observed between the high CO₂-treated and non-treated fruits during shelf life.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO₂-treated peach fruit had higher SSC and titratable acidity than untreated fruit.

Treatment
CO₂-treated fruitse0
Outcome
SSC and titratable aciditye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-treated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits quality parameters such as SSC and titratable acidity were higher in CO₂-treated fruits compared with non-treated fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO₂ pretreatment significantly reduced peach fruit decay.

Treatment
high CO₂ pre-treatmentse0
Outcome
decay of fruitse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
non-treated fruitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high CO₂ pre-treatments significantly reduced decay of fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with non-treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit receiving 60% CO₂ for 6 h scored best for sweetness and overall palatability.

Treatment
60% CO₂ for 6 he0
Outcome
sweetness and overal palatabilitye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits treated with 60% CO₂ for 6 h showed the best score in sweetness and overal palatability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 100% CO₂ for over 3 h inhibited fruit decay.

Treatment
100% CO₂ for over 3 he0
Outcome
decay of fruitse0
Direction
inhibitinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of 100% CO₂ for over 3 h, which showed inhibiting effect on the decay of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 100% CO₂ for over 3 h caused off-flavor from residual CO₂ in flesh.

Treatment
100% CO₂ for over 3 he0
Outcome
off-flavore0
Qualifier
residual CO₂ in fleshe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of 100% CO₂ for over 3 h, which showed inhibiting effect on the decay of fruits, accompanied off-flavor by residual CO₂ in flesh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60% CO₂ for 6 h to control postharvest peach quality without off-flavor.

Material
‘Kurakatawase’e0
Treatment
60% CO₂ for 6 he0
Outcome
good control of postharvest qualitye0
Qualifier
without off-flavore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-treatment of 60% CO₂ for 6 h, therefore, could be used as a good control of postharvest quality of ‘Kurakatawase’ peach fruits without off-flavor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1138 · show in text ↑

co2 · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

co2 · physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.