Abstract
The effect of CGA-362622 on annual grass control in cotton by clethodim and fluazifop-P and crop response was determined in field studies. CGA-362622 applied postemergence at 5.3 g ai/ha injured cotton up to 34% 1 wk after treatment (WAT). Injury was similar when crop oil concentrate (COC) and nonionic surfactant (NIS) were included. Adding fluazifop-P, but not clethodim, to CGA-362622 increased crop injury. Cotton recovered by 3 WAT. CGA-362622 mixed with fluazifop-P at 210 g ai/ha reduced broadleaf signalgrass and large crabgrass control 60 to 80%. Control was similar with COC or NIS in the mixture. Increasing the fluazifop-P rate to 315 g/ha did not improve control. CGA-362622 mixed with clethodim at 105 g ai/ha reduced control 65 to 80% with NIS and 40 to 65% with COC. Increasing the clethodim rate to 175 g/ha, especially with COC, substantially increased control. However, control was still less than that with clethodim at 105 g/ha. Prometryn plus MSMA postemergence-directed 3 wk after gramincide and CGA-362622 application increased control. Cotton yield was similar with clethodim alone and clethodim at 175 g/ha plus CGA-362622. Yield was reduced 29% by CGA-362622 mixed with fluazifop-P at 350 g/ha. Control was reduced by CGA-362622 applied 1 d before or after clethodim but not 5 d before or after clethodim. Control by fluazifop-P was reduced by CGA-362622 applied 1 or 5 d before or 1 d after the graminicide. Under greenhouse conditions, CGA-362622 and pyrithiobac mixed with clethodim, fluazifop-P, quizalofop-P, or sethoxydim reduced control of large crabgrass. Greater antagonism was noted with CGA-362622 than with pyrithiobac, and with fluazifop-P and quizalofop-P than with clethodim or sethoxydim.Nomenclature: CGA-362622 (proposed common name trifloxysulfuron), N-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)carbamoyl]-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamid sodium salt; clethodim; fluazifop-P; MSMA; prometryn; pyrithiobac; quizalofop-P; sethoxydim; broadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash #3 BRAPP; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville BXN 47’.Additional index words: Adjuvants, antagonism, herbicide interactions, herbicide mixtures.Abbreviations: COC, crop oil concentrate; NIS, nonionic surfactant; POST, postemergence; POST-DIR, postemergence directed; WAT, weeks after treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 injured cotton by up to 34% after one week.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- CGA-362622 applied postemergence at 5.3 g ai/hae0
- Outcome
- injured cottone0
- Direction
- injurede0
- Value
- up to 34%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CGA-362622 applied postemergence at 5.3 g ai/ha injured cotton up to 34% 1 wk after treatment (WAT).”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop oil concentrate and nonionic surfactant produced similar cotton injury.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- Injurye0
- Direction
- similare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Injury was similar when crop oil concentrate (COC) and nonionic surfactant (NIS) were included.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluazifop-P added to CGA-362622 increased cotton injury.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Adding fluazifop-Pe0
- Outcome
- crop injurye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- clethodime0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adding fluazifop-P, but not clethodim, to CGA-362622 increased crop injury.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton recovered by three weeks after treatment.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Outcome
- recoverede0
- Qualifier
- 3 WATe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cotton recovered by 3 WAT.”
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 plus fluazifop-P reduced broadleaf signalgrass control by 60 to 80%.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- CGA-362622 mixed with fluazifop-P at 210 g ai/hae0
- Interactor
- broadleaf signalgrass
Urochloa platyphyllae0weed - Outcome
- broadleaf signalgrasse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 60 to 80%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CGA-362622 mixed with fluazifop-P at 210 g ai/ha reduced broadleaf signalgrass and large crabgrass control 60 to 80%.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 plus fluazifop-P reduced large crabgrass control by 60 to 80%.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- CGA-362622 mixed with fluazifop-P at 210 g ai/hae0
- Interactor
- large crabgrasse0weed
- Outcome
- large crabgrass controle0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 60 to 80%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CGA-362622 mixed with fluazifop-P at 210 g ai/ha reduced broadleaf signalgrass and large crabgrass control 60 to 80%.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising the fluazifop-P rate did not improve grass control.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- fluazifop-P rate to 315 g/hae0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- did not improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing the fluazifop-P rate to 315 g/ha did not improve control.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 plus clethodim reduced grass control 65 to 80% with NIS.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- CGA-362622 mixed with clethodim at 105 g ai/hae0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 65 to 80%e0
- Qualifier
- with NISe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CGA-362622 mixed with clethodim at 105 g ai/ha reduced control 65 to 80% with NIS and 40 to 65% with COC.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 plus clethodim reduced grass control 40 to 65% with COC.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- CGA-362622 mixed with clethodim at 105 g ai/hae0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 40 to 65%e0
- Qualifier
- with COCe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CGA-362622 mixed with clethodim at 105 g ai/ha reduced control 65 to 80% with NIS and 40 to 65% with COC.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising clethodim to 175 g/ha increased control, especially with COC.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- clethodim rate to 175 g/hae0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- especially with COCe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing the clethodim rate to 175 g/ha, especially with COC, substantially increased control.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Control with the higher clethodim mixture remained below clethodim alone at 105 g/ha.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Comparator
- clethodim at 105 g/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, control was still less than that with clethodim at 105 g/ha.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Prometryn plus MSMA increased control after prior graminicide and CGA-362622 application.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Prometryn plus MSMA postemergence-directede0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Prometryn plus MSMA postemergence-directed 3 wk after gramincide and CGA-362622 application increased control.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton yield was similar with clethodim alone and high-rate clethodim plus CGA-362622.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Outcome
- Cotton yielde0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- clethodim alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cotton yield was similar with clethodim alone and clethodim at 175 g/ha plus CGA-362622.”
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 plus fluazifop-P reduced cotton yield 29%.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- CGA-362622 mixed with fluazifop-P at 350 g/hae0
- Outcome
- Yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 29%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield was reduced 29% by CGA-362622 mixed with fluazifop-P at 350 g/ha.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 one day before or after clethodim reduced control.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- CGA-362622 applied 1 d before or after clethodime0
- Outcome
- Controle0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- 5 d before or after clethodime0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Control was reduced by CGA-362622 applied 1 d before or after clethodim but not 5 d before or after clethodim.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 reduced fluazifop-P control when applied one or five days before or one day after it.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- CGA-362622 applied 1 or 5 d before or 1 d after the graminicidee0
- Outcome
- Control by fluazifop-Pe0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Control by fluazifop-P was reduced by CGA-362622 applied 1 or 5 d before or 1 d after the graminicide.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 and pyrithiobac mixtures with four graminicides reduced large crabgrass control.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- CGA-362622 and pyrithiobac mixed with clethodim, fluazifop-P, quizalofop-P, or sethoxydime0
- Interactor
- large crabgrasse0weed
- Outcome
- control of large crabgrasse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- greenhouse conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under greenhouse conditions, CGA-362622 and pyrithiobac mixed with clethodim, fluazifop-P, quizalofop-P, or sethoxydim reduced control of large crabgrass.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Antagonism was greater with CGA-362622 than pyrithiobac.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- antagonisme0
- Direction
- Greatere0
- Comparator
- pyrithiobace0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Greater antagonism was noted with CGA-362622 than with pyrithiobac”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Antagonism was greater with fluazifop-P and quizalofop-P than with clethodim or sethoxydim.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- fluazifop-P and quizalofop-Pe0
- Comparator
- clethodim or sethoxydime0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with fluazifop-P and quizalofop-P than with clethodim or sethoxydim.”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
The same questions in other papers
Sethoxydim · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
prometryn · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fluazifop-P · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
fluazifop-P · Urochloa platyphylla · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
herbicide · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →herbicide · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.