Paper · 2012 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of 1-MCP on shelf-life and quality of kiwifruit stored under ambient conditions

Jameel Jhalegar; R.R. Sharma; R. K. Pal; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was conducted to observe the effect of different concentrations of 1-MCP on post-harvest life and quality of kiwifruit. Kiwifruits cv. Allison were treated for 24 h at 20°C with different concentrations of 1-methylcyclopropene (0.5, 1, 2 μl/l) and un-treated fruits served as control. The fruits were transferred to ambient storage (22 ± 4°C; 65–70% RH) after treatments, and observations on different quality parameters were recorded at 3-day interval. The results indicated that all concentrations of 1-MCP influenced PLW, fruit firmness and decay loss in kiwifruit but 2 μl/l concentration was the most effective. PLW in untreated fruits was very high (18.6%) in comparison to 1-MCP treated fruits at the end of 18th day of storage, and 1-MCP (2.0 μl/l) treated fruit were much firmer (31.7 N) than untreated fruit (8.4 N). Fruits treated with 1-MCP (2.0 μl/l) showed the least (8.2%), and untreated fruits the highest fruit decay (22.2%) at the end of storage. TSS in the untreated fruits showed sudden increase on 6th day (12.5%), which increased up to 12th day (16.8%) and declined thereafter (15.7%), whereas in 1-MCP (2 μl/l) treated fruits, it increased sharply from 15th day. 1-MCP (2 μl/l) treated fruit retained ascorbic acid better than other treatments and control. Total acidity and titratable acidity decreased during storage without any significant difference among the treatments. Thus, it could be concluded that 1-MCP (2 μl/l) treated kiwifruits could be stored for 18 days at ambient conditions without much loss in fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All 1-MCP concentrations influenced PLW, firmness and decay, with 2 μl/l most effective.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
PLW, fruit firmness and decay losse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“all concentrations of 1-MCP influenced PLW, fruit firmness and decay loss in kiwifruit but 2 μl/l concentration was the most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated fruit PLW was 18.6% at day 18, higher than treated fruit.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCP treated fruitse0
Outcome
PLWe0
Direction
very highe0
Value
18.6%e0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“PLW in untreated fruits was very high (18.6%) in comparison to 1-MCP treated fruits at the end of 18th day of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2.0 μl/l, treated fruit firmness was 31.7 N versus 8.4 N untreated.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCP (2.0 μl/l)e0
Outcome
firmere0
Direction
firmere0
Value
31.7 Ne0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“1-MCP (2.0 μl/l) treated fruit were much firmer (31.7 N) than untreated fruit (8.4 N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At storage end, 2.0 μl/l 1-MCP produced least fruit decay, 8.2% versus 22.2% untreated.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCP (2.0 μl/l)e0
Outcome
fruit decaye0
Direction
leaste0
Value
8.2%e0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruits treated with 1-MCP (2.0 μl/l) showed the least (8.2%), and untreated fruits the highest fruit decay (22.2%) at the end of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated fruit TSS increase to 12.5%.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
12.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“TSS in the untreated fruits showed sudden increase on 6th day (12.5%), which increased up to 12th day (16.8%) and declined thereafter (15.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated fruit TSS increased to 16.8%.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“TSS in the untreated fruits showed sudden increase on 6th day (12.5%), which increased up to 12th day (16.8%) and declined thereafter (15.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated fruit TSS declined to 15.7%.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
declinede0
Value
15.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“TSS in the untreated fruits showed sudden increase on 6th day (12.5%), which increased up to 12th day (16.8%) and declined thereafter (15.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS in 2 μl/l treated fruits rose sharply from day 15.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCP (2 μl/l)e0
Outcome
ite0
Direction
increased sharplye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“in 1-MCP (2 μl/l) treated fruits, it increased sharply from 15th day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2 μl/l treatment retained ascorbic acid better than other treatments and control.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCP (2 μl/l)e0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other treatments and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“1-MCP (2 μl/l) treated fruit retained ascorbic acid better than other treatments and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1289 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total and titratable acidity declined during storage, without significant differences among treatments.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
Total acidity and titratable aciditye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total acidity and titratable acidity decreased during storage without any significant difference among the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1408 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded 2 μl/l 1-MCP allows 18 days ambient storage with little quality loss.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCP (2 μl/l)e0
Outcome
stored for 18 days at ambient conditions without much loss in fruit qualitye0
Value
18 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“1-MCP (2 μl/l) treated kiwifruits could be stored for 18 days at ambient conditions without much loss in fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1561 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results differ

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · disease · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: phytochemicals · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.