Paper · 2008 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Bioefficacy of acetamiprid on sucking pests in cotton

M. Raghuraman; Ajanta Birah; Gaurendra Gupta

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field trials were undertaken during cotton seasons of 2002–03 and 2003–04 with American cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. var. Pusa 8–6) to evaluate the bioefficacy of acetamiprid 20% SP against sucking insect pests of cotton. Acetamiprid 20% SP at its three doses (20, 40, 80g ai/ha) were effective in suppressing the population of jassid and whitefly significantly up to nine days. All the insecticidal treatments were also significantly effective against thrips. Aphid population was nil during early crop season i.e. up to September, however it started appearing from mid-October and at such stage of the crop significant difference among the treatments was also not observed. The maximum yield (955.5 kg/ha, 1128.8 kg/ha) was recorded in T4 (acetamiprid 80g ai/ha) followed by its next lower dose 40g ai/ha (727.7 kg/ha, 922.2 kg/ha) during cotton season 2002–03 and 2003–04 respectively. The seed cotton yield in untreated control was only 498.8 kg/ha in 2002–03 and 627.7 kg/ha in 2003–04.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid at three doses suppressed jassid populations through nine days.

Treatment
Acetamiprid 20% SP at its three doses (20, 40, 80g ai/ha)e0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
population of jasside0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetamiprid 20% SP at its three doses (20, 40, 80g ai/ha) were effective in suppressing the population of jassid and whitefly significantly up to nine days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–379 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid at three doses suppressed whitefly populations through nine days.

Treatment
Acetamiprid 20% SP at its three doses (20, 40, 80g ai/ha)e0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetamiprid 20% SP at its three doses (20, 40, 80g ai/ha) were effective in suppressing the population of jassid and whitefly significantly up to nine days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–379 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticidal treatments were effective against thrips.

Treatment
insecticidal treatmentse0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
effective against thripse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the insecticidal treatments were also significantly effective against thrips.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids were absent until September and appeared from mid-October.

Interactor
Aphide0pest
Outcome
Aphid populatione0
Qualifier
started appearing from mid-Octobere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aphid population was nil during early crop season i.e. up to September, however it started appearing from mid-October and at such stage of the crop significant difference among the treatments was also not observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not differ significantly in aphid population after mid-October.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Interactor
Aphide0pest
Outcome
Aphid populatione0
Comparator
among the treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aphid population was nil during early crop season i.e. up to September, however it started appearing from mid-October and at such stage of the crop significant difference among the treatments was also not observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield with acetamiprid 80g ai/ha in 2002–03 was 955.5 kg/ha.

Treatment
acetamiprid 80g ai/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
955.5 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2002–03e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield (955.5 kg/ha, 1128.8 kg/ha) was recorded in T4 (acetamiprid 80g ai/ha) followed by its next lower dose 40g ai/ha (727.7 kg/ha, 922.2 kg/ha) during cotton season 2002–03 and 2003–04 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield with acetamiprid 80g ai/ha in 2003–04 was 1128.8 kg/ha.

Treatment
acetamiprid 80g ai/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
1128.8 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2003–04e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield (955.5 kg/ha, 1128.8 kg/ha) was recorded in T4 (acetamiprid 80g ai/ha) followed by its next lower dose 40g ai/ha (727.7 kg/ha, 922.2 kg/ha) during cotton season 2002–03 and 2003–04 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield with 40g ai/ha in 2002–03 was 727.7 kg/ha.

Treatment
40g ai/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
727.7 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2002–03e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield (955.5 kg/ha, 1128.8 kg/ha) was recorded in T4 (acetamiprid 80g ai/ha) followed by its next lower dose 40g ai/ha (727.7 kg/ha, 922.2 kg/ha) during cotton season 2002–03 and 2003–04 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield with 40g ai/ha in 2003–04 was 922.2 kg/ha.

Treatment
40g ai/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
922.2 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2003–04e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield (955.5 kg/ha, 1128.8 kg/ha) was recorded in T4 (acetamiprid 80g ai/ha) followed by its next lower dose 40g ai/ha (727.7 kg/ha, 922.2 kg/ha) during cotton season 2002–03 and 2003–04 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated seed cotton yield was 498.8 kg/ha in 2002–03.

Treatment
untreated controle0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Value
498.8 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2002–03e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed cotton yield in untreated control was only 498.8 kg/ha in 2002–03 and 627.7 kg/ha in 2003–04.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–992 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated seed cotton yield was 627.7 kg/ha in 2003–04.

Treatment
untreated controle0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Value
627.7 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2003–04e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed cotton yield in untreated control was only 498.8 kg/ha in 2002–03 and 627.7 kg/ha in 2003–04.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–992 · show in text ↑

acetamiprid · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

insecticide · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.