Paper · 2004 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Comparative Efficacy and Selectivity of Acetamiprid for the Management of Bemisia tabaci

Steven E. Naranjo; D. H. Akey

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The integrated control concept emphasizes the importance of both chemical and biological control for pest suppression in an agricultural system. A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the selectivity of acetamiprid for controlling sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in cotton compared with a proven selective regime based on insect growth regulators (IGRs) of pyriproxyfen and buprofezin. Acetamiprid was highly effective in controlling all stages of B. tabaci compared to our untreated control and generally produced lower pest densities than the IGR regime. However, six of 14 taxa of arthropod predator were significantly depressed with the use of acetamiprid compared to our untreated control, including common species such as Geocoris punctipes, Orius tristicolor, Chrysoperla carnea, Collops vittatus, Hippodamia convergens, and Drapetis nr. divergens. Compared to other independent and concurrent studies using mixtures of broad-spectrum insecticides at the same research site, acetamiprid depressed fewer populations of predator taxa in our study, but for those taxa affected, reductions from acetamiprid were larger in many cases. In contrast, only one species was significantly reduced in the IGR regime compared with the untreated control. Predator:prey ratios were generally depressed with the use of acetamiprid compared with both the IGR and untreated control regimes. Parasitism by aphelinid parasitoids was unaffected or depressed slightly in all insecticide regimes compared with the control. Although highly efficacious for whitefly control, our results suggest that acetamiprid is a poor substitute for IGRs currently used in an integrated control program for B. tabaci in cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid was highly effective in controlling all stages of Bemisia tabaci in cotton compared with an untreated control.

Treatment
Acetamipride1
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie1pest
Outcome
controlling all stages of B. tabacie1
Direction
highly effectivee1
Comparator
untreated controle1
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the selectivity of acetamiprid for controlling sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–288 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acetamiprid was highly effective in controlling all stages of B. tabaci compared to our untreated control and generally produced lower pest densities than the IGR regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid generally produced lower pest densities in cotton than the IGR regime.

Treatment
Acetamipride1
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie1pest
Outcome
pest densitiese1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
IGR regimee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the selectivity of acetamiprid for controlling sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–288 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acetamiprid was highly effective in controlling all stages of B. tabaci compared to our untreated control and generally produced lower pest densities than the IGR regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid significantly depressed six of 14 arthropod predator taxa compared with the untreated control.

Treatment
acetamipride2
Interactor
arthropod predatore2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
taxa of arthropod predatore2
Direction
depressede2
Value
six of 14e2
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the selectivity of acetamiprid for controlling sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–288 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, six of 14 taxa of arthropod predator were significantly depressed with the use of acetamiprid compared to our untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid depressed fewer populations of predator taxa in cotton than other studies using insecticide mixtures.

Treatment
acetamipride3
Outcome
populations of predator taxae3
Direction
fewere3
Comparator
other independent and concurrent studies using mixtures of broad-spectrum insecticidese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the selectivity of acetamiprid for controlling sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–288 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to other independent and concurrent studies using mixtures of broad-spectrum insecticides at the same research site, acetamiprid depressed fewer populations of predator taxa in our study, but for those taxa affected, reductions from acetamiprid were larger in many cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reductions from acetamiprid in predator taxa were larger in many cases than in other studies using insecticide mixtures.

Treatment
acetamipride3
Outcome
reductionse3
Direction
largere3
Qualifier
for those taxa affectede3
Comparator
other independent and concurrent studies using mixtures of broad-spectrum insecticidese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the selectivity of acetamiprid for controlling sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–288 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to other independent and concurrent studies using mixtures of broad-spectrum insecticides at the same research site, acetamiprid depressed fewer populations of predator taxa in our study, but for those taxa affected, reductions from acetamiprid were larger in many cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only one species was significantly reduced in the IGR regime compared with the untreated control in cotton.

Treatment
IGR regimee4
Outcome
speciese4
Direction
reducede4
Value
only onee4
Comparator
untreated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the selectivity of acetamiprid for controlling sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–288 · show in text ↑
e4

“only one species was significantly reduced in the IGR regime compared with the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator:prey ratios were generally depressed with acetamiprid compared with the IGR and untreated control regimes.

Treatment
use of acetamipride5
Outcome
Predator:prey ratiose5
Direction
depressede5
Comparator
IGR and untreated control regimese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the selectivity of acetamiprid for controlling sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–288 · show in text ↑
e5

“Predator:prey ratios were generally depressed with the use of acetamiprid compared with both the IGR and untreated control regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitism by aphelinid parasitoids was unaffected or slightly depressed in all insecticide regimes compared with the control.

Treatment
insecticide regimese6
Interactor
aphelinid parasitoidse6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Parasitism by aphelinid parasitoidse6
Direction
unaffected or depressed slightlye6
Comparator
the controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the selectivity of acetamiprid for controlling sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–288 · show in text ↑
e6

“Parasitism by aphelinid parasitoids was unaffected or depressed slightly in all insecticide regimes compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1521 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid is a poor substitute for IGRs in the integrated control program for B. tabaci in cotton.

Outcome
acetamiprid is a poor substitute for IGRse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“acetamiprid is a poor substitute for IGRs currently used in an integrated control program for B. tabaci in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1711 · show in text ↑

acetamiprid · ecology: diversity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

acetamiprid · Bemisia tabaci · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

acetamiprid · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.