Paper · 2006 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Walnut grafting as influenced by environment conditions and rootstocks

Abhishek Sharma; Md. Yousuf Dar

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Results revealed that the graft success was maximum in polyhouse environment followed by hot callusing cable (HCC) system. The maximum graft success was recorded on thick rootstocks followed by medium and thin rootstock. Hard shell and soft shell rootstocks were found statistically at par in respect to graft success. Shoot length, rootstock girth at crown level and scion girth above union were found significantly superior under polyhouse over the HCC. Similar results were obtained when thick rootstocks were used for grafting. Soft shell rootstocks were found significantly superior over hard shell ones in respect of scion length, rootstock girth and scion girth. Maximum graft success was obtained under polyhouse from medium rootstocks. The open field conditions proved inferior to polyhouse and hot callusing cable (HCC) system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Graft success was greatest in a polyhouse, followed by hot callusing cable.

Taxon
Walnutt0
Treatment
polyhouse environmente0
Outcome
graft successe0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
hot callusing cable (HCC) systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“graft success was maximum in polyhouse environment followed by hot callusing cable (HCC) system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–121 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thick rootstocks gave the greatest graft success, followed by medium and thin.

Taxon
Walnutt0
Treatment
thick rootstockse0
Outcome
graft successe0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
medium and thin rootstocke0

Verbatim

e0

“maximum graft success was recorded on thick rootstocks followed by medium and thin rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hard- and soft-shell rootstocks were statistically at par for graft success.

Taxon
Walnutt0
Treatment
Hard shelle0
Outcome
graft successe0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Comparator
soft shell rootstockse0

Verbatim

e0

“Hard shell and soft shell rootstocks were found statistically at par in respect to graft success”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot length, rootstock girth and scion girth were greater in the polyhouse than with HCC.

Taxon
Walnutt0
Treatment
polyhousee0
Outcome
Shoot length, rootstock girth at crown level and scion girth above unione0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
HCCe0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot length, rootstock girth at crown level and scion girth above union were found significantly superior under polyhouse over the HCC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thick rootstocks similarly improved shoot length and girth measures.

Taxon
Walnutt0
Treatment
thick rootstockse0
Outcome
Similar resultse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were obtained when thick rootstocks were used for grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soft-shell rootstocks improved scion length, rootstock girth and scion girth over hard-shell rootstocks.

Taxon
Walnutt0
Treatment
Soft shell rootstockse0
Outcome
scion length, rootstock girth and scion girthe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
hard shell onese0

Verbatim

e0

“Soft shell rootstocks were found significantly superior over hard shell ones in respect of scion length, rootstock girth and scion girth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyhouse conditions with medium rootstocks yielded maximum graft success.

Taxon
Walnutt0
Material
medium rootstockse0
Treatment
polyhousee0
Outcome
graft successe0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum graft success was obtained under polyhouse from medium rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open-field conditions were inferior to polyhouse and HCC for grafting.

Taxon
Walnutt0
Treatment
open field conditionse0
Outcome
inferiore0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
polyhouse and hot callusing cable (HCC) systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“The open field conditions proved inferior to polyhouse and hot callusing cable (HCC) system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · Juglans (walnuts)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

protected cultivation · growth · Juglans (walnuts)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.