Paper · 2009 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Soil organic carbon and nutrient uptake vis-à-vis growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) as influenced by water and nitrogen in Typic Haplustept soil.

Rakesh Kumar Singh; Debasis Chakraborty; Rajbir Garg; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2003-04 to monitor the soil organic carbon and the nutrient uptake by pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) under different combinations of irrigation water and nitrogenous fertilizer treatments. In both the years, days of maturity increased with increase in nitrogen doses in irrigated plots. Application of Nitrogen induced higher leaf area index, but the difference in 80 and 120 kg N/ha levels were found to be significant. The increase in biomass accumulation was faster in irrigated plots than the rainfed and it increased with N treatment. The 1000-grain weight increased significantly with successive N levels, but the increment was pronounced only up to 40 kg N/ha in rainfed and up to 120 kg N/ha in irrigated treatment. Grain yield varied significantly with nitrogen application rates as compared to those plots that received no N. Mean yield in irrigated plots was also significantly higher than the unirrigatd plots. Nitrogen content in pearl millet grain was more in irrigated plots and also increased with N doses but no such relations could be established with irrigation as well as nitrogen doses for P and K, while N, P and K content in straw did not show any statistical relationship with either irrigation or fertilizer treatments. During both the rainy (kharif) seasons 2003 and 2004, the soil organic carbon increased at harvest in comparison to that at sowing of the crop, in surface (0-15 cm) and subsurface (15-30 cm) layers; whereas no change or reduction in soil organic carbon content was found in the deeper (30―45 and 45-60 cm) layers. The increments were more in irrigated plots (1 1 ), as compared to rainfed plots (I o ), possibly due to more use efficiency of the fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased days to maturity in irrigated plots.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
increase in nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
days of maturitye0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
irrigated plotse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“days of maturity increased with increase in nitrogen doses in irrigated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased leaf area index, with a significant difference between 80 and 120 kg N/ha.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Nitrogene0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
80 and 120 kg N/ha levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Nitrogen induced higher leaf area index, but the difference in 80 and 120 kg N/ha levels were found to be significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass accumulation was faster in irrigated than rainfed plots.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
irrigated plotse0
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
rainfede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in biomass accumulation was faster in irrigated plots than the rainfed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass accumulation increased with nitrogen treatment.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
N treatmente0
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased with N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in biomass accumulation was faster in irrigated plots than the rainfed and it increased with N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Successive nitrogen levels significantly increased 1000-grain weight, with pronounced increments up to 40 kg N/ha in rainfed plots and 120 kg N/ha in irrigated plots.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
successive N levelse0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
up to 40 kg N/ha in rainfed and up to 120 kg N/ha in irrigated treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1000-grain weight increased significantly with successive N levels, but the increment was pronounced only up to 40 kg N/ha in rainfed and up to 120 kg N/ha in irrigated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased grain yield versus no nitrogen.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
nitrogen application ratese0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Comparator
plots that received no Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield varied significantly with nitrogen application rates as compared to those plots that received no N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean grain yield was significantly higher in irrigated than unirrigated plots.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
irrigated plotse0
Outcome
Mean yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unirrigatd plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean yield in irrigated plots was also significantly higher than the unirrigatd plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain nitrogen content was higher in irrigated plots.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
irrigated plotse0
Outcome
Nitrogen content in pearl millet graine0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen content in pearl millet grain was more in irrigated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain nitrogen content increased with nitrogen dose.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
N dosese0
Outcome
Nitrogen content in pearl millet graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen content in pearl millet grain was more in irrigated plots and also increased with N doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1067 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain phosphorus and potassium showed no established relation to irrigation or nitrogen doses.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
irrigation as well as nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
P and Ke0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no such relations could be established with irrigation as well as nitrogen doses for P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content had no statistical relationship with irrigation or fertilizer treatments.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
irrigation or fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P and K content in strawe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N, P and K content in straw did not show any statistical relationship with either irrigation or fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon increased from sowing to harvest in surface and subsurface layers.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
surface (0-15 cm) and subsurface (15-30 cm) layerse0
Comparator
at sowing of the crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil organic carbon increased at harvest in comparison to that at sowing of the crop, in surface (0-15 cm) and subsurface (15-30 cm) layers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon did not increase in deeper layers.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
soil organic carbon contente0
Direction
no change or reductione0
Qualifier
deeper (30―45 and 45-60 cm) layerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no change or reduction in soil organic carbon content was found in the deeper (30―45 and 45-60 cm) layers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon increments were greater under irrigation than rainfed conditions.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
irrigated plotse0
Outcome
soil organic carbone1
Direction
moree0
Comparator
rainfed plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increments were more in irrigated plots (1 1 ), as compared to rainfed plots (I o )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil organic carbon increased at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1389 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 29 positive, 1 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 40 positive, 6 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 144 positive, 6 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.