Paper · 1999 · Agronomy Journal

Hybrid and Nitrogen Influence on Pearl Millet Production in Nebraska: Yield, Growth, and Nitrogen Uptake, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Nouri Maman; Stephen C. Mason; Tom Galusha; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pearl millet [ Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] is a staple grain crop in the arid and semiarid regions of Africa and India, and a new grain crop in the USA. A 2‐year field experiment was conducted near Mead, NE, in 1995 and 1996 on a Sharpsburg silty clay loam (fine, smectitic, mesic Typic Argiudoll) soil with approximately 29 g kg −1 organic matter, 35 kg ha −1 NO 3 –N, and pH of 6.0. The objective was to determine the influence of hybrid and N on grain yield, dry matter accumulation and partitioning, and growth rates throughout the growing season. Nitrogen concentrations, uptake, and use efficiency were also determined. Treatments were a factorial combination of the pearl millet dwarf hybrids (59022A × 89‐0083, 1011A × 086R, and 1361M × 6Rm) and N levels (0 and 78 kg ha −1 ) in a randomized complete block design. Two plants per plot were sampled at 2‐wk intervals and partitioned into plant parts, dried, weighed, and analyzed for N concentration. Applied N increased grain yield by 0.4 to 0.5 Mg ha −1 , but had only a small effect on dry matter accumulation and partitioning. Hybrid differences were small for grain yield. Pearl millet dry matter accumulation increased cubically in both years, with maximum crop growth rates among hybrids ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 g m −2 per growing degree day (GDD) in 1995 and ranging from 1.9 to 3.1 g m −2 GDD −1 maximum in 1996. The relative growth rate among hybrids declined from 0.012 to 0.020 g −1 m −2 GDD −1 in both years to near zero at physiological maturity. Nitrogen concentrations were higher during the vegetative stages and decreased with plant age. Applied N decreased N use efficiency for aboveground biomass (NUE 1 ) by 18 to 25 g DM g −1 N, and N use efficiency for grain (NUE 2 ) by 7 to 12 g grain g −1 N. Environmental variability due to years had a greater effect on yield, growth, and N levels than hybrid and applied N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen increased grain yield by 0.4 to 0.5 Mg ha −1.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Applied Ne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.4 to 0.5 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied N increased grain yield by 0.4 to 0.5 Mg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen had only a small effect on dry matter accumulation and partitioning.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Applied Ne1
Outcome
dry matter accumulation and partitioninge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but had only a small effect on dry matter accumulation and partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applied N increased grain yield by 0.4 to 0.5 Mg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid differences in grain yield were small.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Material
Hybride0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
smalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid differences were small for grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet dry matter accumulation increased cubically in both years.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
increased cubicallye0
Qualifier
in both yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pearl millet dry matter accumulation increased cubically in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum crop growth rates among hybrids ranged from 0.48 to 0.57 g m −2 per growing degree day in 1995.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
crop growth ratese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.48 to 0.57 g m −2 per growing degree daye0
Qualifier
in 1995e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum crop growth rates among hybrids ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 g m −2 per growing degree day (GDD) in 1995”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum crop growth rates among hybrids ranged from 1.9 to 3.1 g m −2 GDD −1 in 1996.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
crop growth ratese1
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.9 to 3.1 g m −2 GDD −1e0
Qualifier
in 1996e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ranging from 1.9 to 3.1 g m −2 GDD −1 maximum in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum crop growth rates among hybrids ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 g m −2 per growing degree day (GDD) in 1995”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1325 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate among hybrids declined to near zero at physiological maturity.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Organ / stage
physiological maturitye0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
declinede0
Value
0.012 to 0.020 g −1 m −2 GDD −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative growth rate among hybrids declined from 0.012 to 0.020 g −1 m −2 GDD −1 in both years to near zero at physiological maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen concentrations were higher during vegetative stages and decreased with plant age.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Organ / stage
vegetative stagese0
Outcome
Nitrogen concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen concentrations were higher during the vegetative stages and decreased with plant age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen decreased nitrogen use efficiency for aboveground biomass by 18 to 25 g DM g −1 N.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Applied Ne0
Outcome
N use efficiency for aboveground biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
18 to 25 g DM g −1 Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied N decreased N use efficiency for aboveground biomass (NUE 1 ) by 18 to 25 g DM g −1 N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen decreased nitrogen use efficiency for grain by 7 to 12 g grain g −1 N.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Applied Ne1
Outcome
N use efficiency for graine0
Value
7 to 12 g grain g −1 Ne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and N use efficiency for grain (NUE 2 ) by 7 to 12 g grain g −1 N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applied N increased grain yield by 0.4 to 0.5 Mg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1016 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yearly environmental variability had a greater effect on yield, growth and nitrogen levels than hybrid and applied nitrogen.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
yield, growth, and N levelse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
Environmental variability due to yearse0
Comparator
hybrid and applied Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Environmental variability due to years had a greater effect on yield, growth, and N levels than hybrid and applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 40 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 144 positive, 6 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.