Paper · 1998 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Interaction of Nitrogen Availability During Bloom and Light Intensity During Veraison. II. Effects on Anthocyanin and Phenolic Development During Grape Ripening

Markus Keller; Geza Hrazdina

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
186
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grape ripening is affected by a number of environmental factors, and of these light and nitrogen (N) are of particular importance. Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines, we studied the effects of N availability at bloom (0.34, 1.7, or 3.4 g N per plant as NH4NO3) and light intensity at veraison (3 weeks at 100%, 20%, or 2% sunlight, using shade cloth) on the accumulation of total phenols, anthocyanins and flavonols in ripening grapes. Total soluble solids in the pulp were closely correlated with total phenols (r2 = 0.91***), total anthocyanins (r2 = 0.90***) and total flavonols (r2 = 0.52***) in the skin in all treatments. High rates of N supply delayed the accumulation of phenolic compounds, particularly flavonols, in the grape skin at veraison. However, the differences between N treatments generally decreased towards fruit maturity. Low light intensity at veraison restricted phenolics accumulation even more than did heavy N supply and the effects of low light were most severe in vines with high N status. However, ripening was not stopped entirely by light intensities as low as the light compensation point of photosynthesis. Moreover, removal of the shade cloth partly restored the rate of phenolics accumulation in the berry skin. All five anthocyanins started accumulating concurrently at the inception of ripening. However, while peonidin-, malvidin-, and cyanidin-3-glucosides were the major pigments at veraison, malvidin- and delphinidin-3-glucosides became most abundant towards maturity. The accumulation of cyanidin-3-glucoside was most strongly influenced by prevailing environmental conditions, while malvidin-3-glucoside was the least affected. Thus, the proportions of individual anthocyanins were most equal at low N status and high light intensity, whereas the percentage of malvidin-3-glucoside increased with high rates of N fertilization and became predominant under low light intensity. This is important for red winemaking, because the grape skins9 anthocyanin profile determines the color potential of the resulting wine. Excessive N fertilization can decrease wine quality, particularly when light conditions during grape ripening are poor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble solids in the pulp were closely correlated with total phenols in the skin (r2 = 0.91).

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Organ / stage
skine2
Outcome
total phenolse2
Value
r2 = 0.91e2
Qualifier
total soluble solids in the pulpe2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total soluble solids in the pulp were closely correlated with total phenols (r2 = 0.91***), total anthocyanins (r2 = 0.90***) and total flavonols (r2 = 0.52***) in the skin in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–652 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble solids in the pulp were closely correlated with total anthocyanins in the skin (r2 = 0.90).

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Organ / stage
skine2
Outcome
total anthocyaninse2
Value
r2 = 0.90e2
Qualifier
total soluble solids in the pulpe2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total soluble solids in the pulp were closely correlated with total phenols (r2 = 0.91***), total anthocyanins (r2 = 0.90***) and total flavonols (r2 = 0.52***) in the skin in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–652 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble solids in the pulp were closely correlated with total flavonols in the skin (r2 = 0.52).

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Organ / stage
skine2
Outcome
total flavonolse2
Value
r2 = 0.52e2
Qualifier
total soluble solids in the pulpe2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total soluble solids in the pulp were closely correlated with total phenols (r2 = 0.91***), total anthocyanins (r2 = 0.90***) and total flavonols (r2 = 0.52***) in the skin in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N supply delayed the accumulation of phenolic compounds, particularly flavonols, in grape skin at veraison.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Organ / stage
grape skin at veraisone2
Treatment
High rates of N supplye2
Outcome
accumulation of phenolic compounds, particularly flavonolse2
Direction
delayede2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“High rates of N supply delayed the accumulation of phenolic compounds, particularly flavonols, in the grape skin at veraison”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light intensity at veraison restricted phenolics accumulation more than heavy N supply did.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
Low light intensity at veraisone2
Outcome
phenolics accumulatione2
Direction
restrictede2
Comparator
heavy N supplye2
Setting
pot-growne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Low light intensity at veraison restricted phenolics accumulation even more than did heavy N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effects of low light were most severe in vines with high N status.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
low lighte2
Outcome
effects of low lighte2
Direction
most severee2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“the effects of low light were most severe in vines with high N status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripening was not stopped entirely at light intensities as low as the light compensation point of photosynthesis.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
light intensities as low as the light compensation point of photosynthesise2
Outcome
ripeninge2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“ripening was not stopped entirely by light intensities as low as the light compensation point of photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing the shade cloth partly restored the rate of phenolics accumulation in berry skin.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Organ / stage
berry skine2
Treatment
removal of the shade clothe2
Outcome
rate of phenolics accumulatione2
Direction
partly restorede2
Comparator
shade clothe2
Setting
pot-growne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“removal of the shade cloth partly restored the rate of phenolics accumulation in the berry skin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1272 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All five anthocyanins started accumulating concurrently at the inception of ripening.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Organ / stage
inception of ripeninge2
Outcome
anthocyanins started accumulating concurrentlye2
Setting
pot-growne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“All five anthocyanins started accumulating concurrently at the inception of ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peonidin-3-glucoside, malvidin-3-glucoside and cyanidin-3-glucoside were the major pigments at veraison.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Organ / stage
veraisone2
Outcome
peonidin-, malvidin-, and cyanidin-3-glucosides were the major pigmentse2
Setting
pot-growne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“while peonidin-, malvidin-, and cyanidin-3-glucosides were the major pigments at veraison”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1458 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malvidin-3-glucoside and delphinidin-3-glucoside became most abundant towards maturity.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Organ / stage
towards maturitye2
Outcome
malvidin- and delphinidin-3-glucosides became most abundante2
Setting
pot-growne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“malvidin- and delphinidin-3-glucosides became most abundant towards maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1536 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulation of cyanidin-3-glucoside was most strongly influenced by prevailing environmental conditions.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
prevailing environmental conditionse2
Outcome
accumulation of cyanidin-3-glucosidee2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“The accumulation of cyanidin-3-glucoside was most strongly influenced by prevailing environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1646 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malvidin-3-glucoside was the least affected anthocyanin by the prevailing conditions.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Outcome
malvidin-3-glucosidee2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“while malvidin-3-glucoside was the least affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1697 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proportions of individual anthocyanins were most equal at low N status and high light intensity.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
low N status and high light intensitye2
Outcome
proportions of individual anthocyaninse2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Thus, the proportions of individual anthocyanins were most equal at low N status and high light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percentage of malvidin-3-glucoside increased with high rates of N fertilization.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
high rates of N fertilizatione2
Outcome
percentage of malvidin-3-glucosidee2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“the percentage of malvidin-3-glucoside increased with high rates of N fertilization and became predominant under low light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malvidin-3-glucoside became predominant under low light intensity.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
low light intensitye2
Outcome
percentage of malvidin-3-glucosidee2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“the percentage of malvidin-3-glucoside increased with high rates of N fertilization and became predominant under low light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences between N treatments generally decreased towards fruit maturity.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Organ / stage
fruit maturitye2
Treatment
N treatmentse2
Outcome
differences between N treatmentse2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
generallye2
Setting
pot-growne1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“the differences between N treatments generally decreased towards fruit maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–868 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that excessive N fertilization can decrease wine quality, particularly when light during ripening is poor.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
Excessive N fertilizatione2
Outcome
wine qualitye2
Direction
decreasee2
Qualifier
particularly when light conditions during grape ripening are poore2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Using pot-grown Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Excessive N fertilization can decrease wine quality, particularly when light conditions during grape ripening are poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2085–2203 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

shade · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 1 positive, 9 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.