Paper · 2014 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Effects on Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds in Greenhouse

Kubilay Kurtuluş Baştaş

13
claims
36
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bacterial canker of tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis produces considerable economic losses in many countries because effective control measures are lacking. In this study, the effectiveness of some chemicals, a plant growth regulator (Prohexadione-Ca (PC)), two plant activators (hydrogen peroxide (HP)) and harpin protein (Hrp), fungicides, maneb+copper (MC), copper compounds (copper sulfate pentahydrate (CSP) copper hydroxide (CH) and copper oxychloride (CO)) and an antibiotic, streptomycin sulphate on the pathogen were assessed in vitro and in vivo on two tomato cultivars, Newton and Orient. In Hrp and HP treated plants, reduction in disease severity (about 45%) was correlated with suppression of bacterial growth during the time course of infection. The activities of POX, GPX and PAL enzymes were determined at 5th day as markers of resistance and applications of Hrp, PC and HP induced a progressive and significant increase of both enzymes in locally treated tissues. Only PC treatments have decreased plant heights and the effectiveness of PC in reduction of plant heigths was up to 40%. Among copper compounds, CSP and CO combination with Maneb were the most effective on the disease severity (about 50%). In addition, CSP combination with Hrp, HP and PC significantly limited the pathogen population in vitro and they showed considerable effects on the disease symptoms compared with CSP alone. We conclude that Hrp, HP and PC may be useful in controlling external symptoms of this disease in greenhouses, and is environmentally friendly, reducing the amount of copper applied to crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hrp treatment reduced tomato bacterial canker severity by about 45%.

Treatment
Hrpe0
Interactor
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensisClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensist1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
about 45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis · Interactor · picture of the speciesMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Hrp and HP treated plants, reduction in disease severity (about 45%) was correlated with suppression of bacterial growth during the time course of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HP treatment reduced tomato bacterial canker severity by about 45%.

Treatment
HPe0
Interactor
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensisClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensist1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
about 45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis · Interactor · picture of the speciesMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Hrp and HP treated plants, reduction in disease severity (about 45%) was correlated with suppression of bacterial growth during the time course of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity reduction in Hrp and HP treated plants correlated with suppression of bacterial growth.

Treatment
Hrp and HPe0
Interactor
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensisClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensist1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis · Interactor · picture of the speciesMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Hrp and HP treated plants, reduction in disease severity (about 45%) was correlated with suppression of bacterial growth during the time course of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hrp induced a significant progressive increase of resistance-marker enzyme activities in locally treated tissues.

Organ / stage
locally treated tissuese0
Treatment
Hrpe0
Outcome
both enzymese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications of Hrp, PC and HP induced a progressive and significant increase of both enzymes in locally treated tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PC induced a significant progressive increase of resistance-marker enzyme activities in locally treated tissues.

Organ / stage
locally treated tissuese0
Treatment
PCe0
Outcome
both enzymese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications of Hrp, PC and HP induced a progressive and significant increase of both enzymes in locally treated tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HP induced a significant progressive increase of resistance-marker enzyme activities in locally treated tissues.

Organ / stage
locally treated tissuese0
Treatment
HPe0
Outcome
both enzymese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications of Hrp, PC and HP induced a progressive and significant increase of both enzymes in locally treated tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC decreased tomato plant height by up to 40%.

Treatment
PCe0
Outcome
plant heightse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
up to 40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only PC treatments have decreased plant heights and the effectiveness of PC in reduction of plant heigths was up to 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSP with Maneb reduced disease severity by about 50% and was among the most effective combinations.

Treatment
CSPe0
Interactor
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensisClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensist1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
about 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis · Interactor · picture of the speciesMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among copper compounds, CSP and CO combination with Maneb were the most effective on the disease severity (about 50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO with Maneb reduced disease severity by about 50% and was among the most effective combinations.

Treatment
CO combination with Manebe0
Interactor
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensisClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensist1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
about 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis · Interactor · picture of the speciesMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among copper compounds, CSP and CO combination with Maneb were the most effective on the disease severity (about 50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSP combined with Hrp significantly limited pathogen populations in vitro.

Treatment
CSP combination with Hrpe0
Interactor
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensisClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensist1pathogen
Outcome
pathogen populatione0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis · Interactor · picture of the speciesMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CSP combination with Hrp, HP and PC significantly limited the pathogen population in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSP combined with HP significantly limited pathogen populations in vitro.

Treatment
CSP combination with Hrp, HPe0
Interactor
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensisClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensist1pathogen
Outcome
pathogen populatione0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis · Interactor · picture of the speciesMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CSP combination with Hrp, HP and PC significantly limited the pathogen population in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSP combined with PC significantly limited pathogen populations in vitro.

Treatment
CSP combination with Hrp, HP and PCe0
Interactor
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensisClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensist1pathogen
Outcome
pathogen populatione0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis · Interactor · picture of the speciesMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CSP combination with Hrp, HP and PC significantly limited the pathogen population in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSP combinations with Hrp, HP and PC showed considerable effects on tomato disease symptoms compared with CSP alone.

Treatment
CSP combination with Hrp, HP and PCe1
Interactor
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensisClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensist1pathogen
Outcome
disease symptomse0
Comparator
CSP alonee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis · Interactor · picture of the speciesMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they showed considerable effects on the disease symptoms compared with CSP alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Bacterial Canker of Resistance Inducers and Copper Compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“CSP combination with Hrp, HP and PC significantly limited the pathogen population in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1356 · show in text ↑

copper atom · Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.