Abstract
An experiment was undertaken to manage powdery mildew Erysiphe cichoracearum of Okra by using fungicides and bioagents. Three sprays of difenconazole (17.26% PDI) followed by two sprays of difenconazole in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens (19.21% PDI) were found effective in managing powdery mildew of okra. The maximum benefit cost ratio was recorded in three sprays of propiconazole which was followed by three sprays of difenconazole. Thus, among the treatment combination Pseudomonas fluorescens and nimbicidin intermixed with propiconazole and difenconazole spray schedule not only reduced the cost of protection but also gave higher benefits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Three difenconazole sprays managed okra powdery mildew with 17.26% PDI.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Three sprays of difenconazolee0
- Interactor
- Erysiphe cichoracearum
Golovinomyces cichoracearume1pathogen - Outcome
- PDIe0
- Value
- 17.26%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)

Verbatim
t0“Okra”
e0“Three sprays of difenconazole (17.26% PDI)”
e1“powdery mildew Erysiphe cichoracearum of Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Two difenconazole sprays with Pseudomonas fluorescens managed powdery mildew with 19.21% PDI.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- two sprays of difenconazole in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescense0
- Interactor
- Erysiphe cichoracearum
Golovinomyces cichoracearume1pathogen - Second interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- PDIe0
- Value
- 19.21%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)

Verbatim
t0“Okra”
e0“two sprays of difenconazole in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens (19.21% PDI)”
e1“powdery mildew Erysiphe cichoracearum of Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Three propiconazole sprays gave the maximum benefit cost ratio.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- three sprays of propiconazolee0
- Outcome
- maximum benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- three sprays of difenconazolee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Okra”
e0“The maximum benefit cost ratio was recorded in three sprays of propiconazole which was followed by three sprays of difenconazole.”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment combinations reduced protection cost and gave higher benefits.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescens and nimbicidin intermixed with propiconazole and difenconazole spray schedulee0
- Outcome
- cost of protectione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Okra”
e0“Pseudomonas fluorescens and nimbicidin intermixed with propiconazole and difenconazole spray schedule not only reduced the cost of protection but also gave higher benefits”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment combinations gave higher benefits.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescens and nimbicidin intermixed with propiconazole and difenconazole spray schedulee0
- Outcome
- benefitse0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Okra”
e0“Pseudomonas fluorescens and nimbicidin intermixed with propiconazole and difenconazole spray schedule not only reduced the cost of protection but also gave higher benefits”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Golovinomyces cichoracearum · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · Golovinomyces cichoracearum · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.