Paper · 2010 · Indian journal of plant protection

Bioefficacy of New Formulation of Emamectin Benzoate 5 SG against Bollworm Complex in Cotton

K. Govindan; K. Gunasekaran; S. Kuttalam; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out to evaluate the efficacy of emamectin benzoate 5 SG, a new formulation against cotton bollworm complex compared to commercial Proclaim® (emamectin benzoate 5 SG), spinosad 45 SC and endosulfan 35 EC, during first season at Vellan Koil in winter season (Cv. MCU 5) and second season at Erangkattur in summer season (Cv. Surabhi). Emamectin benzoate 5 SG at 11 and 15 g a.i. ha−1 was highly effective in reducing the boll and locule damage when compared to other standard check, spinosad 45 SC @ 75 g a.i. ha1 and endosulfan 35 EC @ 350 g a.i. ha−1. The lowest per cent boll and locule damage was recorded with the foliar application of emamectin benzoate 5 SG at 11 g a.i. ha−1 on par with 15 g a.i. ha−1 which also increased the yield of cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate at 11 g a.i. ha−1 reduced boll and locule damage versus standard checks.

Treatment
Emamectin benzoate 5 SG at 11e0
Outcome
boll and locule damagee0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
spinosad 45 SCe0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emamectin benzoate 5 SG at 11 and 15 g a.i. ha−1 was highly effective in reducing the boll and locule damage when compared to other standard check, spinosad 45 SC @ 75 g a.i. ha1 and endosulfan 35 EC @ 350 g a.i. ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate at 15 g a.i. ha−1 reduced boll and locule damage versus standard checks.

Treatment
15 g a.i. ha−1e0
Interactor
BollwormHelicoverpa zeat0pest
Outcome
boll and locule damagee0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
endosulfan 35 ECe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emamectin benzoate 5 SG at 11 and 15 g a.i. ha−1 was highly effective in reducing the boll and locule damage when compared to other standard check, spinosad 45 SC @ 75 g a.i. ha1 and endosulfan 35 EC @ 350 g a.i. ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bollworm Complex in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 11 g a.i. ha−1 foliar treatment had the lowest boll and locule damage, on par with 15 g a.i. ha−1.

Treatment
foliar application of emamectin benzoate 5 SG at 11 g a.i. ha−1e0
Interactor
BollwormHelicoverpa zeat0pest
Outcome
per cent boll and locule damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
15 g a.i. ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest per cent boll and locule damage was recorded with the foliar application of emamectin benzoate 5 SG at 11 g a.i. ha−1 on par with 15 g a.i. ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bollworm Complex in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 11 g a.i. ha−1 foliar treatment increased cotton yield.

Treatment
foliar application of emamectin benzoate 5 SG at 11 g a.i. ha−1e0
Outcome
yield of cottone0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of emamectin benzoate 5 SG at 11 g a.i. ha−1 on par with 15 g a.i. ha−1 which also increased the yield of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–783 · show in text ↑

emamectin benzoate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

emamectin benzoate · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

emamectin benzoate · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.