Abstract
Das AK, Khaliq QA, Haider ML (2012) Efficiency of wheat-lentil and wheat-chickpea intercropping systems at different planting configurations. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 7(1), 25-33. This intercropping experiment was planned under the concept of cereal-legume intercropping system to find out the efficiency of wheat-lentil and wheat-chickpea intercropping systems at different planting configurations. During the experiment the data on yield parameters of the component crops were recorded under sole cropping and intercropped conditions. Finally intercropping efficiencies were calculated out from the recorded data. Grain yield in wheat, lentil and chickpea were higher in sole crops. But corresponding equivalent yields were higher than those in sole crops. Intercropping efficiencies varied significantly with the variation in crop combination and planting configurations. The intercropping efficiency LER, SLER, AYL and IA were recorded the highest 1.46, 1.69, 0.81 and 2.41, respectively in wheat-chickpea intercropping at 2:2 row ratios. Wheat was appeared as more competitive than lentil and chickpea, irrespective of the planting configurations. In the sole cropping system the BCR was the highest (2.26) for lentil. Under intercropping system the highest BCR (2.07) was recorded in wheat- lentil intercropping at 1:1 row ratio.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain yield was higher in sole cropping than intercropping.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- sole cropse0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield in wheat, lentil and chickpea were higher in sole crops.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil grain yield was higher in sole cropping than intercropping.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- sole cropse0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield in wheat, lentil and chickpea were higher in sole crops.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea grain yield was higher in sole cropping than intercropping.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- sole cropse0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield in wheat, lentil and chickpea were higher in sole crops.”
Claim · model-written summary
Corresponding equivalent yields were higher under intercropping than sole cropping.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- intercroppingt0
- Outcome
- equivalent yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- sole cropse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“But corresponding equivalent yields were higher than those in sole crops.”
t0“wheat-lentil and wheat-chickpea intercropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping efficiency varied significantly by crop combination and planting configuration.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- crop combination and planting configurationse0
- Outcome
- Intercropping efficienciese0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping efficiencies varied significantly with the variation in crop combination and planting configurations.”
t0“WHEAT-LENTIL AND WHEAT-CHICKPEA”
Claim · model-written summary
LER reached 1.46 in wheat-chickpea intercropping at a 2:2 row ratio.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- wheat-chickpea intercropping at 2:2 row ratiose0
- Outcome
- LERe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.46e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The intercropping efficiency LER, SLER, AYL and IA were recorded the highest 1.46, 1.69, 0.81 and 2.41, respectively in wheat-chickpea intercropping at 2:2 row ratios.”
Claim · model-written summary
SLER reached 1.69 in wheat-chickpea intercropping at a 2:2 row ratio.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- wheat-chickpea intercropping at 2:2 row ratiose0
- Outcome
- SLERe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.69e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The intercropping efficiency LER, SLER, AYL and IA were recorded the highest 1.46, 1.69, 0.81 and 2.41, respectively in wheat-chickpea intercropping at 2:2 row ratios.”
Claim · model-written summary
AYL reached 0.81 in wheat-chickpea intercropping at a 2:2 row ratio.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- wheat-chickpea intercropping at 2:2 row ratiose0
- Outcome
- AYLe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.81e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The intercropping efficiency LER, SLER, AYL and IA were recorded the highest 1.46, 1.69, 0.81 and 2.41, respectively in wheat-chickpea intercropping at 2:2 row ratios.”
Claim · model-written summary
IA reached 2.41 in wheat-chickpea intercropping at a 2:2 row ratio.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- wheat-chickpea intercropping at 2:2 row ratiose0
- Outcome
- IAe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.41e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The intercropping efficiency LER, SLER, AYL and IA were recorded the highest 1.46, 1.69, 0.81 and 2.41, respectively in wheat-chickpea intercropping at 2:2 row ratios.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat was more competitive than lentil across planting configurations.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- more competitivee0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- lentile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat was appeared as more competitive than lentil and chickpea, irrespective of the planting configurations.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat was more competitive than chickpea across planting configurations.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- more competitivee0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- chickpeae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat was appeared as more competitive than lentil and chickpea, irrespective of the planting configurations.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil sole cropping had the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.26.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the sole cropping system the BCR was the highest (2.26) for lentil.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat-lentil intercropping at a 1:1 row ratio had the highest intercropping benefit-cost ratio, 2.07.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- wheat- lentil intercropping at 1:1 row ratioe0
- Outcome
- BCRe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.07e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under intercropping system the highest BCR (2.07) was recorded in wheat- lentil intercropping at 1:1 row ratio.”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- negative
185 papers more in this group
See all 189 papers →intercropping · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →intercropping · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.