Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Interspecific Facilitative Root Interactions and Rhizosphere Effects on Phosphorus and Iron Nutrition Between Mixed Grown Chickpea and Barley

Aydin Gunes; Esra G. Bagci; Ali Inal

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT A glasshouse study was conducted to investigate the effects of interspecific complementary and competitive root interactions and rhizosphere effects on phosphorus (P) and iron (Fe) nutrition of mixed grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). In order to provide more physiological evidence on the mechanisms of interspecific facilitation, we determined phosphatase activities in plant and rhizosphere, and root ferric reducing capacity (FR), Fe-solubilizing activity (Fe-SA) and rhizosphere pH. The results of the experiment revealed that biomass yield of barley was significantly increased by associated chickpea as compared to monocultured barley, while mixed cropping caused a slight decreases in the biomass yield of chickpea. The rhizosphere was strongly acidified under chickpea and chickpea/barley mixed cropping and this acidification, in turn, increased the available P, Fe(II) and DTPA-Fe concentrations in the rhizosphere. Fe-solubilizing activity (Fe-SA) and ferric reducing (FR) capacity of the roots were higher in both species grown in mixed culture relative to their monoculture which may improve Fe nutrition of both species. Leaf acid phosphatase (APase, EC 3.1.3.2) activity was higher in both plants under mixed cropping that may improve P nutrition of barley by chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley biomass yield was significantly increased by associated chickpea compared with monocultured barley.

Treatment
associated chickpeae1
Interactor
chickpeaCicer arietinume1other
Outcome
biomass yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
monocultured barleye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · InteractorSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–276 · show in text ↑
e1

“biomass yield of barley was significantly increased by associated chickpea as compared to monocultured barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea biomass yield slightly decreased under mixed cropping.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
mixed croppinge2
Outcome
biomass yielde2
Direction
decreasese2
Qualifier
slighte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–276 · show in text ↑
e2

“mixed cropping caused a slight decreases in the biomass yield of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rhizosphere was strongly acidified under chickpea and under chickpea/barley mixed cropping.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
chickpea and chickpea/barley mixed croppinge3
Outcome
rhizospheree3
Direction
strongly acidifiede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–276 · show in text ↑
e3

“The rhizosphere was strongly acidified under chickpea and chickpea/barley mixed cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–855 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere acidification increased available P, Fe(II) and DTPA-Fe concentrations in chickpea and barley mixtures.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
rhizospheree4
Outcome
available P, Fe(II) and DTPA-Fe concentrationse4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
acidificatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–276 · show in text ↑
e4

“this acidification, in turn, increased the available P, Fe(II) and DTPA-Fe concentrations in the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea root Fe-solubilizing activity and ferric reducing capacity were higher in mixed culture than in monoculture.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
mixed culturee5
Outcome
Fe-solubilizing activity (Fe-SA) and ferric reducing (FR) capacity of the rootse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
monoculturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–276 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fe-solubilizing activity (Fe-SA) and ferric reducing (FR) capacity of the roots were higher in both species grown in mixed culture relative to their monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley root Fe-solubilizing activity and ferric reducing capacity were higher in mixed culture than in monoculture.

Treatment
mixed culturee5
Outcome
Fe-solubilizing activity (Fe-SA) and ferric reducing (FR) capacity of the rootse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
monoculturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–276 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fe-solubilizing activity (Fe-SA) and ferric reducing (FR) capacity of the roots were higher in both species grown in mixed culture relative to their monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea leaf acid phosphatase activity was higher under mixed cropping.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
mixed croppinge6
Gene
APasee6
Outcome
Leaf acid phosphatase (APase, EC 3.1.3.2) activitye6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–276 · show in text ↑
e6

“Leaf acid phosphatase (APase, EC 3.1.3.2) activity was higher in both plants under mixed cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley leaf acid phosphatase activity was higher under mixed cropping.

Treatment
mixed croppinge6
Gene
APasee6
Outcome
Leaf acid phosphatase (APase, EC 3.1.3.2) activitye6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–276 · show in text ↑
e6

“Leaf acid phosphatase (APase, EC 3.1.3.2) activity was higher in both plants under mixed cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1276 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed cropping with chickpea may improve P nutrition of barley.

Interactor
chickpeaCicer arietinume7other
Outcome
P nutritione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · InteractorSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“may improve P nutrition of barley by chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1327 · show in text ↑

Cicer arietinum · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 48 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.