Paper · 1996

EFFECT OF COLD HARDENING ON SOME PHOTOSYNTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PEA (Pisum sativum L., CV. RAN 1) PLANTS

I. Yordanov; Katya Georgieva; Tsonko Tsonev; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary. The effect of 96 h cold acclimation of pea (Pisum sativum L., cv. Ran 1) plants on their photosynthetic capacity was investigated. It was found that pea plants were able to modulate their photosynthetic rate during growth at low temperature and adjust it to needs for survival. The advantages of hardening to low temperature were very clearly expressed when the effects on O 2 evolution and on the relative part of Q B non-reducing centres were analysed. Analysis of photosynthetic rates and fluorescence parameters showed that these processes were more resistant to freezing in cold hardened than in non-hardened pea plants. It was proposed that for pea plants the maintenance of active photosynthesis at low overzero temperatures is also very important for survival, because in early spring such unfavourable conditions are not rare.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea plants modulated their photosynthetic rate during growth at low temperature after 96 h cold acclimation.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Material
RAN 1t0
Treatment
96 h cold acclimatione5
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Qualifier
adjust it to needs for survivale1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EFFECT OF COLD HARDENING ON SOME PHOTOSYNTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PEA (Pisum sativum L., CV. RAN 1) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“It was found that pea plants were able to modulate their photosynthetic rate during growth at low temperature and adjust it to needs for survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–285 · show in text ↑
e5

“The effect of 96 h cold acclimation of pea (Pisum sativum L., cv. Ran 1) plants on their photosynthetic capacity was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardening to low temperature gave clear advantages for O 2 evolution and the relative part of Q B non-reducing centres in pea.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
hardening to low temperaturee2
Outcome
O 2 evolution and on the relative part of Q B non-reducing centrese2
Direction
advantagese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EFFECT OF COLD HARDENING ON SOME PHOTOSYNTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PEA (Pisum sativum L., CV. RAN 1) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“The advantages of hardening to low temperature were very clearly expressed when the effects on O 2 evolution and on the relative part of Q B non-reducing centres were analysed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold-hardened pea plants had photosynthetic rates and fluorescence parameters more resistant to freezing than non-hardened plants.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
cold hardenede3
Outcome
photosynthetic rates and fluorescence parameterse3
Direction
more resistant to freezinge3
Comparator
non-hardened pea plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EFFECT OF COLD HARDENING ON SOME PHOTOSYNTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PEA (Pisum sativum L., CV. RAN 1) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“Analysis of photosynthetic rates and fluorescence parameters showed that these processes were more resistant to freezing in cold hardened than in non-hardened pea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–633 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Maintaining active photosynthesis at low overzero temperatures is proposed to be very important for pea survival.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
survivale4
Qualifier
maintenance of active photosynthesis at low overzero temperaturese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EFFECT OF COLD HARDENING ON SOME PHOTOSYNTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PEA (Pisum sativum L., CV. RAN 1) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e4

“It was proposed that for pea plants the maintenance of active photosynthesis at low overzero temperatures is also very important for survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–776 · show in text ↑

cold · physiology: photosynthesis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.