Paper · 2011

FIELD PERFORMANCE OF TRICHOGRAMMA CHILONIS AGAINST COTTON BOLLWORMS INFESTATION IN DIFFERENT COTTON VARIETIES AS A SUSTAINABLE IPM APPROACH

A. Masood; Muhammad Jalal Arif; Muhammad Hamed; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted on six cotton varieties to evaluate the performance of Trichogramma chilonis against the infestation of Helicoverpa armigera and Earias insulana at Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad. Data regarding percentage infestation from biological control plot and unsprayed plot was recorded at weekly interval. It was observed that due to the presence of egg parasitoid, H. armigera damage, reduction over control was ranging from 31.73 to 36.45 % on cotton varieties, i.e. SLH-279, FH-945, NIAB-111, CIM-499, CIM-707 and FH-901, respectively. While E. insulana reduction percentage was 32.43 to 45.49 % less compared to control on the same varieties mentioned above. However, maximum suppression of H. armigera (49.71%) was observed on NIAB-111 during 2 nd week of September and E. insulana 54.99% on SLH-279 during 1 st week of August followed by 52.68% (NIAB-111) during 1 st week of October. It is concluded that Trichogramma chilonis is successfully used as biological agent in integrated pest management program.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The egg parasitoid reduced H. armigera damage on cotton varieties by 31.73 to 36.45% relative to control.

Treatment
presence of egg parasitoide0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
egg parasitoide0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
H. armigera damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
31.73 to 36.45 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“due to the presence of egg parasitoid, H. armigera damage, reduction over control was ranging from 31.73 to 36.45 % on cotton varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. insulana damage was reduced by 32.43 to 45.49% compared with control.

Taxon
COTTON VARIETIESGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor
E. insulanaEarias insulanae0pest
Outcome
E. insulana reduction percentagee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
32.43 to 45.49 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. insulana reduction percentage was 32.43 to 45.49 % less compared to control on the same varieties mentioned above”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–109 · show in text ↑
t1

“COTTON VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum H. armigera suppression was 49.71% on NIAB-111 during the second week of September.

Taxon
COTTON VARIETIESGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
NIAB-111e0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
suppression of H. armigerae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
49.71%e0
Qualifier
2 nd week of Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum suppression of H. armigera (49.71%) was observed on NIAB-111 during 2 nd week of September”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–109 · show in text ↑
t1

“COTTON VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum E. insulana suppression was 54.99% on SLH-279 during the first week of August.

Taxon
COTTON VARIETIESGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
SLH-279e0
Interactor
E. insulanaEarias insulanae0pest
Outcome
E. insulanae0
Value
54.99%e0
Qualifier
1 st week of Auguste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. insulana 54.99% on SLH-279 during 1 st week of August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–109 · show in text ↑
t1

“COTTON VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. insulana suppression was 52.68% on NIAB-111 during the first week of October.

Taxon
COTTON VARIETIESGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
NIAB-111e0
Interactor
E. insulanaEarias insulanae0pest
Outcome
52.68%e0
Value
52.68%e0
Qualifier
1 st week of Octobere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. insulana 54.99% on SLH-279 during 1 st week of August followed by 52.68% (NIAB-111) during 1 st week of October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–109 · show in text ↑
t1

“COTTON VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–109 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude Trichogramma chilonis can be used as an integrated pest management biological agent.

Taxon
COTTON VARIETIESGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor
Trichogramma chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
integrated pest management programe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichogramma chilonis is successfully used as biological agent in integrated pest management program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–109 · show in text ↑
t1

“COTTON VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–109 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · Helicoverpa armigera · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.