Paper · 2007

Effect of Adjuvants on the Performance of Pyraclostrobin for Controlling Cercospora Leaf Spot on Sugarbeet

Mohamed F. R. Khan; G. A. Richards; R. Harikrishnan; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cercospora leaf spot (CLS), caused by the fungus Cercospora beticola, is the most damaging foliar disease of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Minnesota and North Dakota. Most fields require fungicide applications to control CLS and to improve sugar yield and quality. Trials were conducted near Breckenridge, Minnesota, in 2001 and 2002, to determine the effect of adjuvants added to pyraclostrobin on control of CLS and on sugarbeet yield and quality. Cercospora leaf spot severity was low in both years of the trial. Pyraclostrobin applied alone always provided effective control of Cercospora leaf spot. Adjuvants in combination with pyraclostrobin did not result in a significant improvement in disease control, yield, and quality compared to pyraclostrobin applied alone. Addition of adjuvants to pyraclostrobin in most cases increased phytotoxicity, and in some instances reduced yield, compared to pyraclostrobin applied alone. Based on these results, there was no consistent benefit of adding adjuvants to pyraclostrobin for CLS control or for increased sugar yield and quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cercospora leaf spot severity was low in both trial years.

Interactor
Cercospora beticolaCercospora beticolat1pathogen
Outcome
Cercospora leaf spot severitye0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora beticola
Cercospora beticola · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora leaf spot severity was low in both years of the trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cercospora beticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin alone consistently controlled sugarbeet Cercospora leaf spot effectively.

Treatment
Pyraclostrobin applied alonee0
Interactor
Cercospora beticolaCercospora beticolat1pathogen
Outcome
control of Cercospora leaf spote0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora beticola
Cercospora beticola · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyraclostrobin applied alone always provided effective control of Cercospora leaf spot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cercospora beticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding adjuvants did not significantly improve disease control, yield or quality over pyraclostrobin alone.

Treatment
Adjuvants in combination with pyraclostrobine0
Interactor
Cercospora beticolaCercospora beticolat1pathogen
Outcome
disease control, yield, and qualitye0
Direction
did not result in a significant improvemente0
Comparator
pyraclostrobin applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora beticola
Cercospora beticola · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adjuvants in combination with pyraclostrobin did not result in a significant improvement in disease control, yield, and quality compared to pyraclostrobin applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cercospora beticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adjuvants usually increased phytotoxicity relative to pyraclostrobin alone.

Treatment
Addition of adjuvants to pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in most casese0
Comparator
pyraclostrobin applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of adjuvants to pyraclostrobin in most cases increased phytotoxicity, and in some instances reduced yield, compared to pyraclostrobin applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adjuvants sometimes reduced sugarbeet yield relative to pyraclostrobin alone.

Treatment
Addition of adjuvants to pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in some instancese0
Comparator
pyraclostrobin applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of adjuvants to pyraclostrobin in most cases increased phytotoxicity, and in some instances reduced yield, compared to pyraclostrobin applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–106 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

adjuvant · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pyraclostrobin · Cercospora beticola · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

adjuvant · crop injury · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.