Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences (IJACS)

Salinity Effects on the Physiological Parameters and Oxidative Enzymatic Activities of Four Iranian Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. ) Cultivar

Hamed Doulati Baneh; Hiwa Attari; Abbas Hassani; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil salinity is one of the major stresses especially in arid and semi-arid regions and can limit vine growth and productivity however responses can be different based on genotypes. In this study, effects of different concentration (0, 40, 80 and 120 Mm) NaCl on photosynthetic rate, soluble sugars, proline content and CAT activity of four own-rooted vinifera cultivars (Askari, Yaghoti, Sarghola and Rasha) were analyzed. Photosynthesis rates reduced (P �0.05) by increasing salinity, the highest and lowest reduction in photosynthesis rate was observed in Yaghoti and Rasha cultivars, respectively. Soluble sugars and proline content as an osmoregulation increased markedly at the highest NaCl concentration. Yaghoti had the highest and Rasha showed lowest soluble sugars and proline content. By increasing salt levels from 0 to 120 mM, the activity of CAT in Rasha and Sarghola cultivars increased but, Askari and Yaghoti showed no response to different NaCl concentrations. In conclusion, the Rasha cultivar was more tolerant than other varieties in response to salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis rates declined as salinity increased.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
Photosynthesis ratese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Photosynthesis rates reduced (P �0.05) by increasing salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–485 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yaghoti had the greatest reduction in photosynthesis under salinity.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Yaghotie0
Outcome
reduction in photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Rashae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest and lowest reduction in photosynthesis rate was observed in Yaghoti and Rasha cultivars, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–600 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rasha had the smallest reduction in photosynthesis under salinity.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Rashae0
Outcome
reduction in photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
Yaghotie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest and lowest reduction in photosynthesis rate was observed in Yaghoti and Rasha cultivars, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugars increased markedly at the highest NaCl concentration.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
highest NaCl concentratione0
Outcome
Soluble sugarse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soluble sugars and proline content as an osmoregulation increased markedly at the highest NaCl concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content increased markedly at the highest NaCl concentration.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
highest NaCl concentratione0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soluble sugars and proline content as an osmoregulation increased markedly at the highest NaCl concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–710 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yaghoti had the highest soluble sugar and proline contents.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Yaghotie0
Outcome
soluble sugars and proline contente0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Rashae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yaghoti had the highest and Rasha showed lowest soluble sugars and proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–794 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rasha had the lowest soluble sugar and proline contents.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Rashae0
Outcome
soluble sugars and proline contente0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
Yaghotie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yaghoti had the highest and Rasha showed lowest soluble sugars and proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT activity increased in Rasha as salt rose from 0 to 120 mM.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Rashae0
Treatment
increasing salt levels from 0 to 120 mMe0
Gene
CATe0
Outcome
activity of CATe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“By increasing salt levels from 0 to 120 mM, the activity of CAT in Rasha and Sarghola cultivars increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT activity increased in Sarghola as salt rose from 0 to 120 mM.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Sargholae0
Treatment
increasing salt levels from 0 to 120 mMe0
Gene
CATe0
Outcome
activity of CATe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“By increasing salt levels from 0 to 120 mM, the activity of CAT in Rasha and Sarghola cultivars increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Askari CAT activity showed no response to differing NaCl concentrations.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Askarie0
Treatment
different NaCl concentrationse0
Gene
CATe1
Outcome
activity of CATe1
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Askari and Yaghoti showed no response to different NaCl concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–977 · show in text ↑
e1

“the activity of CAT in Rasha and Sarghola cultivars increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yaghoti CAT activity showed no response to differing NaCl concentrations.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Yaghotie0
Treatment
different NaCl concentrationse0
Gene
CATe1
Outcome
activity of CATe1
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Askari and Yaghoti showed no response to different NaCl concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–977 · show in text ↑
e1

“the activity of CAT in Rasha and Sarghola cultivars increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–901 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged Rasha more tolerant of salinity than the other grapevine varieties.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Rashae0
Outcome
tolerante0
Direction
more tolerante0
Comparator
other varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Rasha cultivar was more tolerant than other varieties in response to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1075 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.