Paper · 2004 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Concentration Dependence of `Redchief Delicious' Apple Fruit Softening and Chlorophyll Fluorescence to Repeated Doses of 1-Methylcyclopropene

Sastry S. Jayanty; Mauricio Cañoles; Randolph M. Beaudry

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We studied the dose-response of `Redchief Delicious' apple [ Malus sylvestris (L) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] fruit to repeated (weekly) dosages of 0.0, 0.02, 0.1, and 1.0 μL·L -1 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) by measuring fruit firmness and chlorophyll fluorescence throughout an extended storage period at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 °C. The rate of firmness loss for nontreated fruit increased with increasing temperature. 1-MCP applied at concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 μL·L -1 slowed firmness loss. The 1-MCP dose-response curve for the rate of firmness loss was essentially the same for all five temperatures. A concentration of 1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP prevented firmness loss at all temperatures for the duration of the study; however, after holding fruit for an additional 7 days at room temperature, the fruit stored at 10 °C softened with increasing storage duration, whereas fruit at stored at higher and lower temperatures did not. The influence of 1-MCP on chlorophyll fluorescence (Fo and Fm) was markedly affected by temperature; Fo increased during storage at higher storage temperatures and this increase was enhanced by 1-MCP. Conversely, Fm decreased during storage and the rate of decline was much greater at the higher storage temperatures; the rate of decline was reduced by 1-MCP, but only at the higher storage temperatures. Photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of nontreated fruit declined with time for all storage temperatures. Treatment with 0.1 and 1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP only marginally reduced the rate of decline of photochemical efficiency. Sample loss due to decay increased with temperature, but was reduced by 1-MCP at all temperatures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated apple fruit lost firmness faster at higher temperature.

Treatment
increasing temperaturee0
Outcome
rate of firmness losse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of firmness loss for nontreated fruit increased with increasing temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly 0.1 μL·L -1 1-MCP slowed firmness loss.

Treatment
1-MCP applied at concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 μL·L -1e0
Outcome
firmness losse0
Direction
slowede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP applied at concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 μL·L -1 slowed firmness loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The firmness-loss dose-response curve was essentially the same at all five temperatures.

Outcome
dose-response curve for the rate of firmness losse0
Direction
essentially the samee0
Qualifier
all five temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1-MCP dose-response curve for the rate of firmness loss was essentially the same for all five temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP prevented firmness loss during the study at all temperatures.

Treatment
1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCPe0
Outcome
firmness losse0
Direction
preventede0
Qualifier
at all temperatures for the duration of the studye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A concentration of 1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP prevented firmness loss at all temperatures for the duration of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 7 days at room temperature, fruit stored at 10 °C softened with longer storage.

Treatment
stored at 10 °Ce0
Outcome
softenede0
Direction
softenede0
Qualifier
an additional 7 days at room temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after holding fruit for an additional 7 days at room temperature, the fruit stored at 10 °C softened with increasing storage duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the extra 7 days, fruit stored at higher and lower temperatures did not soften.

Outcome
did note0
Qualifier
higher and lower temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas fruit at stored at higher and lower temperatures did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–937 · show in text ↑
e1

“after holding fruit for an additional 7 days at room temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fo increased during storage at higher temperatures and 1-MCP enhanced that increase.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
Foe0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
higher storage temperaturese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fo increased during storage at higher storage temperatures and this increase was enhanced by 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fm declined during storage faster at higher temperatures.

Treatment
higher storage temperaturese0
Outcome
Fme0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fm decreased during storage and the rate of decline was much greater at the higher storage temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced the Fm decline rate only at higher storage temperatures.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
rate of declinee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
only at the higher storage temperaturese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of decline was reduced by 1-MCP, but only at the higher storage temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1342 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fm decreased during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photochemical efficiency of untreated fruit declined over time at all temperatures.

Treatment
all storage temperaturese0
Outcome
Photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of nontreated fruit declined with time for all storage temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.1 and 1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP marginally reduced photochemical-efficiency decline.

Treatment
Treatment with 0.1 and 1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCPe0
Outcome
rate of decline of photochemical efficiencye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
only marginallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 0.1 and 1.0 μL·L -1 1-MCP only marginally reduced the rate of decline of photochemical efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decay-related sample loss increased with temperature.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
Sample loss due to decaye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sample loss due to decay increased with temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced decay-related sample loss at all temperatures.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
Sample loss due to decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at all temperaturese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sample loss due to decay increased with temperature, but was reduced by 1-MCP at all temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

49 papers: 33 positive, 16 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

120 papers: 113 positive, 7 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.