Paper · 2013 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Plant Growth Reducers: An Alternative To Increase The Juice Production Potential And Decrease The Lodging Of Sweet Sorghum

Carvalho, Marcia Eugenia Amaral; Castro, Paulo Roberto de Camargo; Dias, Carlos Tadeu dos Santos

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The plant growth regulators can improve the crop performance, making the plant architecture more adapted and efficient in order to use environmental resources and inputs to support the high-yielding agronomic traits. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of three growth reducers on the sweet sorghum development. The experimental design was completely randomized (CRD) with four treatments and eight replications. The treatments were control (water), maleic hydrazide 1.44 g a.i. L-1, paclobutrazol 1.5 g a.i. L-1 and chlormequat 0.5 g a.i. L-1. The sorghum development was evaluated by biometric parameters, relative chlorophyll content and potential of juice production. All growth regulators decreased the growth rate of sorghum, resulting in the height reduction (20.56 to 33.94% compared to control). These compounds also increased the relative chlorophyll content (22.15 to 29.54%), but did not change the fresh and dry mass of shoot. Furthermore, the juice production potential was increased after application of chlormequat and paclobutrazol (2.72 to 4.56% in relation to control). These results indicate that growth reducers can be an alternative to decrease the lodging and increase juice production of sweet sorghum ‘Ceres 81’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators reduced sweet sorghum height by 20.56 to 33.94% relative to control.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
growth regulatorse1
Outcome
heighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
20.56 to 33.94%e1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

t0

“Decrease The Lodging Of Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“All growth regulators decreased the growth rate of sorghum, resulting in the height reduction (20.56 to 33.94% compared to control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators increased relative chlorophyll content by 22.15 to 29.54% relative to control.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
growth regulatorse1
Outcome
relative chlorophyll contente2
Direction
increasede2
Value
22.15 to 29.54%e2
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

t0

“Decrease The Lodging Of Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“All growth regulators decreased the growth rate of sorghum, resulting in the height reduction (20.56 to 33.94% compared to control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–823 · show in text ↑
e2

“These compounds also increased the relative chlorophyll content (22.15 to 29.54%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators did not change fresh and dry shoot mass of sweet sorghum.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
growth regulatorse1
Outcome
fresh and dry mass of shoote3
Direction
did not changee3
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

t0

“Decrease The Lodging Of Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“All growth regulators decreased the growth rate of sorghum, resulting in the height reduction (20.56 to 33.94% compared to control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–823 · show in text ↑
e3

“but did not change the fresh and dry mass of shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlormequat and paclobutrazol increased juice production potential of sweet sorghum by 2.72 to 4.56% relative to control.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
chlormequat and paclobutrazole4
Outcome
juice production potentiale4
Direction
increasede4
Value
2.72 to 4.56%e4
Comparator
controle4

Verbatim

t0

“Decrease The Lodging Of Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“Furthermore, the juice production potential was increased after application of chlormequat and paclobutrazol (2.72 to 4.56% in relation to control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growth reducers can be an alternative to decrease lodging and increase juice production of sweet sorghum.

Taxon
sweet sorghume5
Treatment
growth reducerse5
Outcome
decrease the lodging and increase juice productione5

Verbatim

t0

“Decrease The Lodging Of Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–122 · show in text ↑
e5

“These results indicate that growth reducers can be an alternative to decrease the lodging and increase juice production of sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1245 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · yield · SorghumResults differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

paclobutrazol · yield · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

class · growth · SorghumResults agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.