Paper · 2013

Investigation of proline, total protein, chlorophyll, ascorbate and dehydroascorbate changes under drought stress in Akria and Mobil tomato cultivars

Mahlagha Ghorbanli; Gafarabad Maryam; Amirkian Tannaz; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
71
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study the effects of drought stress on proline, protein, chlorophyll a/b, ascorbate and dehrydroascorbate were investigated in Akri and Mobil cultivars of tomato species. The seeds were cultured at 23 °C with 15-16 hours light period and irrigation was done based on field capacity control (FC), mild drought stress (⅔ FC) and severe drought stress (⅓ FC) under greenhouse conditions. After nine weeks of sowing, leaf, stem and root were isolated and studied for various indices. The results indicated that amount of proline increased significantly in mild and severe stresses in root, but in stem and leaf proline increased only under severe drought stress. Chlorophyll a and b and total protein decreased significantly in mild and severe stress in leaf, stem and root. Ascorbic acid (ASC) increased but dehydro ascorbate decreased significantly in both species. It could be concluded that in both cultivars proline and ASC content increased under severe and mild drought stress although soluble protein and chlorophyll a/b decreased under severe stress. Therefore, in tomato plants osmolyte such as proline and also ASC as an antioxidant compound increased against drought stress. Protein accumulation has protecting role under mild stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato root proline increased significantly under mild and severe drought.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
mild and severe stressese0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amount of proline increased significantly in mild and severe stresses in root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato stem and leaf proline increased only under severe drought.

Organ / stage
stem and leafe0
Treatment
severe drought stresse0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in stem and leaf proline increased only under severe drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a and b decreased significantly under mild and severe stress in tomato leaf, stem and root.

Organ / stage
leaf, stem and roote0
Treatment
mild and severe stresse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll a and be0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a and b and total protein decreased significantly in mild and severe stress in leaf, stem and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total protein decreased significantly under mild and severe stress in tomato leaf, stem and root.

Organ / stage
leaf, stem and roote0
Treatment
mild and severe stresse0
Outcome
total proteine0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a and b and total protein decreased significantly in mild and severe stress in leaf, stem and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid increased in both tomato cultivars under drought.

Outcome
Ascorbic acid (ASC)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ascorbic acid (ASC) increased but dehydro ascorbate decreased significantly in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydroascorbate decreased significantly in both tomato cultivars.

Outcome
dehydro ascorbatee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ascorbic acid (ASC) increased but dehydro ascorbate decreased significantly in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–149 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret proline and ascorbic acid increases as responses against drought stress.

Outcome
increasede0
Qualifier
against drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in tomato plants osmolyte such as proline and also ASC as an antioxidant compound increased against drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1189 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors assert that protein accumulation has a protective role under mild stress.

Outcome
protecting rolee0
Qualifier
under mild stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein accumulation has protecting role under mild stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–149 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

26 papers: 17 positive, 9 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.