Paper · 2006 · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology

Effects of Different Levels of Water Stress on Leaf Water Potential, Stomatal Resistance, Protein and Chlorophyll Content and Certain Anti‐oxidative Enzymes in Tomato Plants

Hatem Zgallaï; Kathy Steppe; Raoul Lemeur

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
40
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A greenhouse experiment was performed in order to investigate the effects of different levels of water stress on leaf water potential (Ψ w ), stomatal resistance (r s ), protein content and chlorophyll (Chl) content of tomato plants ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Nikita). Water stress was induced by adding polyethylene glycol (PEG 6 000) to the nutrient solution to reduce the osmotic potential (Ψ s ). We investigated the behavior of anti‐oxidant enzymes, such as catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), during the development of water stress. Moderate and severe water stress (i.e. Ψs= ‐0.51 and ‐1.22 MPa, respectively) caused a decrease in Ψ w for all treated (water‐stressed) plants compared with control plants, with the reduction being more pronounced for severely stressed plants. In addition, r s was significantly affected by the induced water stress and a decrease in leaf soluble proteins and Chl content was observed. Whereas CAT activity remained constant, SOD activity was increased in water‐stressed plants compared with unstressed plants. These results indicate the possible role of SOD as an anti‐oxidant protector system for plants under water stress conditions. Moreover, it suggests the possibility of using this enzyme as an additional screening criterion for detecting water stress in plants. (Managing editor: Ping He)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate and severe stress reduced tomato leaf water potential relative to controls, more under severe stress.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
Moderate and severe water stresse0
Outcome
Ψ we0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
more pronounced for severely stressed plantse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate and severe water stress (i.e. Ψs= ‐0.51 and ‐1.22 MPa, respectively) caused a decrease in Ψ w for all treated (water‐stressed) plants compared with control plants, with the reduction being more pronounced for severely stressed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly affected stomatal resistance without a stated direction.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
induced water stresse0
Outcome
r se0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“r s was significantly affected by the induced water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased leaf soluble protein content.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
induced water stresse0
Outcome
leaf soluble proteinse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, r s was significantly affected by the induced water stress and a decrease in leaf soluble proteins and Chl content was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased chlorophyll content.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
induced water stresse0
Outcome
Chl contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, r s was significantly affected by the induced water stress and a decrease in leaf soluble proteins and Chl content was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity remained constant under water stress.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
water‐stressed plantse0
Gene
CATe0
Outcome
CAT activitye0
Direction
remained constante0
Comparator
unstressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whereas CAT activity remained constant, SOD activity was increased in water‐stressed plants compared with unstressed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD activity increased in water-stressed relative to unstressed plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
water‐stressed plantse0
Gene
SODe0
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unstressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whereas CAT activity remained constant, SOD activity was increased in water‐stressed plants compared with unstressed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest SOD may protect plants under water stress.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Gene
SODe0
Outcome
anti‐oxidant protector systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results indicate the possible role of SOD as an anti‐oxidant protector system for plants under water stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest using SOD activity as a water-stress screening criterion.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Outcome
additional screening criterion for detecting water stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it suggests the possibility of using this enzyme as an additional screening criterion for detecting water stress in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–173 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

26 papers: 17 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

39 papers: 17 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.