Paper · 2001 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Flower Production, Fruit Set, and Physiology of Bell Pepper during Elevated Temperature and Vapor Pressure Deficit

Ami N. Erickson; Albert H. Markhart

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
78
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

High temperature reduces fruit set in bell pepper [ Capsicum annuum L. var. annuum (Grossum Group)], and reduction of pepper productivity, resulting from high temperature, may be a direct effect of temperature or an indirect effect of water stress induced by increased vapor pressure deficits (VPDs) at high temperature. We evaluated responses of plant growth, reproduction, net photosynthesis (P N ), chlorophyll fluorescence, predawn respiration, leaf water potential, and stomatal conductance of `Ace' and `Bell Boy' bell pepper to elevated temperature (33 °C) with increased VPD (2.1 kPa) or elevated temperature with no increase in VPD (1.1 kPa). VPD had no effect on flower number or fruit set and did not adversely influence the physiological processes measured. Therefore, deleterious effects of high temperature on pepper fruit set does not appear to be temperature induced water stress, but is more likely a direct temperature response. Elevated temperature decreased fruit set but not flower production. Gas exchange measurements suggest failure to set fruit was not due to reduced leaf photosynthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased VPD did not affect flower number.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
VPDe0
Outcome
flower numbere0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“VPD had no effect on flower number or fruit set and did not adversely influence the physiological processes measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased VPD did not affect fruit set.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
VPDe0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“VPD had no effect on flower number or fruit set and did not adversely influence the physiological processes measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased VPD did not adversely influence measured physiological processes.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
VPDe0
Outcome
physiological processes measurede0
Direction
did not adversely influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“VPD had no effect on flower number or fruit set and did not adversely influence the physiological processes measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature decreased fruit set.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated temperature decreased fruit set but not flower production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature did not decrease flower production.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
flower productione0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated temperature decreased fruit set but not flower production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors inferred heat effects on fruit set were a direct temperature response.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
high temperaturee0
Outcome
pepper fruit sete0
Qualifier
more likely a direct temperature responsee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“deleterious effects of high temperature on pepper fruit set does not appear to be temperature induced water stress, but is more likely a direct temperature response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–945 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gas exchange suggested fruit set failure was not due to reduced leaf photosynthesis.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Outcome
failure to set fruite0
Qualifier
reduced leaf photosynthesise0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“failure to set fruit was not due to reduced leaf photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑

humidity · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

heat · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.