Paper · 2014

Effects of Nitrogen application on snap beans production in Koibatek district Kenya

A.M. Mbeke; Stella C. Kirui; N.C. Kibet; et al.

13
claims
38
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ranks first among vegetables produced for the export market in Kenya. All Snap beans were planted in different treatments containing various levels of Nitrogen of Calcium Ammonium Nitrate (CAN) Treatments T1- T2 had IgN,1.5gN, 2.0gN, 2.5gN, 5gN, 10gN and 15gN respectively while T8 was inoculated with Rhizobium. The control T9 lacked nitrogen. All were supplied with equal amounts of phosphorus fertilizer (5.5g) single super phosphate per plant. The effects of different levels of nitrogen were determined on the vegetative growth, seed and pod production and nodulation. It was found that an increase in nitrogen application increased vegetative growth, dry matter production, seed and pod production. Increased Nitrogen application had a negative effect on nodulation. T1 which had the least level of nitrogen application managed to modulate moderately and also had high yields and dry matter production as compared to the control. However, inoculation alone had best nodulation but seed production, vegetative growth and dry matter production was low compared to the treatment with least nitrogen indicating that the nitrogen fixed through nodules was not enough for maximum production. From this study, it can be recommended that 22kg N/ha would be economical for snap beans production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application increased vegetative growth in snap beans.

Taxon
Snap beane1
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control T9e2

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in nitrogen application increased vegetative growth, dry matter production, seed and pod production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e2

“The control T9 lacked nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application increased dry matter production in snap beans.

Taxon
Snap beane1
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control T9e2

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in nitrogen application increased vegetative growth, dry matter production, seed and pod production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e2

“The control T9 lacked nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application increased seed in snap beans.

Taxon
Snap beane1
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control T9e2

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in nitrogen application increased vegetative growth, dry matter production, seed and pod production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e2

“The control T9 lacked nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application increased pod production in snap beans.

Taxon
Snap beane1
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
pod productione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control T9e2

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in nitrogen application increased vegetative growth, dry matter production, seed and pod production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e2

“The control T9 lacked nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application reduced nodulation.

Taxon
Snap beane1
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
negative effecte0
Comparator
control T9e2

Verbatim

e0

“Increased Nitrogen application had a negative effect on nodulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–806 · show in text ↑
e1

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e2

“The control T9 lacked nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest nitrogen treatment had higher yields than the control.

Taxon
Snap beane1
Treatment
T1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“T1 which had the least level of nitrogen application managed to modulate moderately and also had high yields and dry matter production as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest nitrogen treatment had higher dry matter production than the control.

Taxon
Snap beane1
Treatment
T1e0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“T1 which had the least level of nitrogen application managed to modulate moderately and also had high yields and dry matter production as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest nitrogen treatment had moderate nodulation.

Taxon
Snap beane1
Treatment
T1e0
Outcome
modulate moderatelye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“T1 which had the least level of nitrogen application managed to modulate moderately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–890 · show in text ↑
e1

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation alone gave the best nodulation.

Taxon
Snap beane2
Treatment
inoculated with Rhizobiume1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
treatment with least nitrogene3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation alone had best nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1016 · show in text ↑
e1

“T8 was inoculated with Rhizobium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–346 · show in text ↑
e2

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the treatment with least nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation alone gave lower seed production than the lowest nitrogen treatment.

Taxon
Snap beane3
Treatment
inoculated with Rhizobiume2
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
seed productione0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
treatment with least nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed production, vegetative growth and dry matter production was low compared to the treatment with least nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation alone had best nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1016 · show in text ↑
e2

“T8 was inoculated with Rhizobium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–346 · show in text ↑
e3

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation alone gave lower vegetative growth than the lowest nitrogen treatment.

Taxon
Snap beane3
Treatment
inoculated with Rhizobiume2
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
treatment with least nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed production, vegetative growth and dry matter production was low compared to the treatment with least nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation alone had best nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1016 · show in text ↑
e2

“T8 was inoculated with Rhizobium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–346 · show in text ↑
e3

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation alone gave lower dry matter production than the lowest nitrogen treatment.

Taxon
Snap beane3
Treatment
inoculated with Rhizobiume2
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
treatment with least nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed production, vegetative growth and dry matter production was low compared to the treatment with least nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation alone had best nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1016 · show in text ↑
e2

“T8 was inoculated with Rhizobium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–346 · show in text ↑
e3

“Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 22kg N/ha as economical for snap bean production.

Taxon
snap beanse0
Outcome
22kg N/ha would be economical for snap beans productione0

Verbatim

e0

“it can be recommended that 22kg N/ha would be economical for snap beans production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1326 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

31 papers: 9 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 44 positive, 16 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

156 papers: 131 positive, 25 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

152 papers more in this group

See all 156 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.