Abstract
Competitive behaviour of component crops in sesame-greengram intercropping systems under different nutrient management was studied on a sandy loam soil at the University of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya Mohanpur during summer season for two consecutive years. Under the INM practice the yield of sesame, greengram and sesame equivalent yield were significantly higher (39.63, 18.13 and 30.02%, respectively) than organic nutrient management. Integrated nutrient management the sesame grown in association with greengram appeared to be a dominant crop as indicated by its higher values of land equivalent ratio, monetary advantage, area time equivalent ratio, relative value total, competitive ratio and positive sign of the aggressivity. This indicates that when sesame grown in association with greengram utilized the resources more aggressively in ratio sesame + greengram (2:2) is compared sesame + greengram (2:4). Among the intercrops, greengram proved to be more competitive under integrated nutrient management over the organic nutrient management.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management increased sesame yield by 39.63% versus organic management.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicume0 - Treatment
- INM practicee0
- Outcome
- yield of sesamee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 39.63e0
- Comparator
- organic nutrient managemente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under the INM practice the yield of sesame, greengram and sesame equivalent yield were significantly higher (39.63, 18.13 and 30.02%, respectively) than organic nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management increased greengram yield by 18.13% versus organic management.
- Taxon
- greengram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatae0 - Treatment
- INM practicee0
- Outcome
- yield of sesame, greengrame0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 18.13e0
- Comparator
- organic nutrient managemente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Under the INM practice the yield of sesame, greengram and sesame equivalent yield were significantly higher (39.63, 18.13 and 30.02%, respectively) than organic nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management increased sesame equivalent yield by 30.02% versus organic management.
- Taxon
- sesameSesamum indicume0
- Treatment
- INM practicee0
- Outcome
- sesame equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 30.02%e0
- Comparator
- organic nutrient managemente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under the INM practice the yield of sesame, greengram and sesame equivalent yield were significantly higher (39.63, 18.13 and 30.02%, respectively) than organic nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Sesame was dominant in the sesame–greengram intercrop under integrated nutrient management.
- Taxon
- sesameSesamum indicume0
- Interactor
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0weed
- Outcome
- dominant crope0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Integrated nutrient management the sesame grown in association with greengram appeared to be a dominant crop as indicated by its higher values of land equivalent ratio, monetary advantage, area time equivalent ratio, relative value total, competitive ratio and positive sign of the aggressivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Sesame used resources more aggressively in the 2:2 than 2:4 sesame–greengram arrangement.
- Taxon
- sesameSesamum indicume0
- Interactor
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0weed
- Outcome
- utilized the resourcese0
- Direction
- more aggressivelye0
- Value
- 2:2e0
- Comparator
- sesame + greengram (2:4)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sesame grown in association with greengram utilized the resources more aggressively in ratio sesame + greengram (2:2) is compared sesame + greengram (2:4)”
Claim · model-written summary
Greengram was more competitive under integrated than organic nutrient management.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- integrated nutrient managemente0
- Outcome
- competitivee0
- Direction
- more competitivee0
- Comparator
- organic nutrient managemente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“greengram proved to be more competitive under integrated nutrient management over the organic nutrient management”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results differ
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
371 papers more in this group
See all 375 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.