Abstract
The present study was carried out at the farms of Agricultural University Peshawar, KPK Pakistan during 2007. Experiments were conducted using RCB design with split plot arrangements, having four replications. Different wheat varieties viz., Uqab 2000, Saleem 2000 and Pirsabak 2004 while nitrogen levels (0, tap water, 90 kg ha -1 in soil, 120 kg ha -1 in soil, 150 kg ha -1 in soil, 90 kg ha -1 (2/3 rd soil + 1/3 rd foliar), 120 kg ha -1 (2/3 rd soil + 1/3 rd foliar) and 150 kg ha -1 (2/3 rd soil + 1/3 rd foliar) to subplots were used. Days to heading and maturity, plant height, productive and non productive tillers m -2 , spike length, grains spike -1 , 1000 grain weight and grain yield was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different varieties, nitrogen levels and method of N application. Nitrogen concentration in straw and grain was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different nitrogen levels and method of N application. Significantly higher grain yield was produced by Pirsabak 2004 when compared with other varieties. In case of N levels, maximum grain yield was produced by treatments fertilized with highest dose of foliar N.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat varieties, nitrogen levels and application methods significantly affected Days to heading and maturity.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- nitrogen levels and method of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- Days to heading and maturitye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to heading and maturity, plant height, productive and non productive tillers m -2 , spike length, grains spike -1 , 1000 grain weight and grain yield was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different varieties, nitrogen levels and method of N application.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat varieties, nitrogen levels and application methods significantly affected plant height.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogen levels and method of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to heading and maturity, plant height, productive and non productive tillers m -2 , spike length, grains spike -1 , 1000 grain weight and grain yield was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different varieties, nitrogen levels and method of N application.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat varieties, nitrogen levels and application methods significantly affected productive and non productive tillers m -2.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogen levels and method of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- productive and non productive tillers m -2e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to heading and maturity, plant height, productive and non productive tillers m -2 , spike length, grains spike -1 , 1000 grain weight and grain yield was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different varieties, nitrogen levels and method of N application.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat varieties, nitrogen levels and application methods significantly affected spike length.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogen levels and method of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- spike lengthe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to heading and maturity, plant height, productive and non productive tillers m -2 , spike length, grains spike -1 , 1000 grain weight and grain yield was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different varieties, nitrogen levels and method of N application.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat varieties, nitrogen levels and application methods significantly affected grains spike -1.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogen levels and method of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- grains spike -1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to heading and maturity, plant height, productive and non productive tillers m -2 , spike length, grains spike -1 , 1000 grain weight and grain yield was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different varieties, nitrogen levels and method of N application.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat varieties, nitrogen levels and application methods significantly affected 1000 grain weight.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogen levels and method of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- 1000 grain weighte0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to heading and maturity, plant height, productive and non productive tillers m -2 , spike length, grains spike -1 , 1000 grain weight and grain yield was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different varieties, nitrogen levels and method of N application.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat varieties, nitrogen levels and application methods significantly affected grain yield.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogen levels and method of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to heading and maturity, plant height, productive and non productive tillers m -2 , spike length, grains spike -1 , 1000 grain weight and grain yield was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different varieties, nitrogen levels and method of N application.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen levels and application method significantly affected Nitrogen concentration in straw.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogen levels and method of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- Nitrogen concentration in strawe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen concentration in straw and grain was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different nitrogen levels and method of N application.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen levels and application method significantly affected Nitrogen concentration in straw and grain.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogen levels and method of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- Nitrogen concentration in straw and graine0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen concentration in straw and grain was significantly (p<0.05) affected by different nitrogen levels and method of N application.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Pirsabak 2004 yielded more grain than the other varieties.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Pirsabak 2004e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other varietiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher grain yield was produced by Pirsabak 2004 when compared with other varieties.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest foliar nitrogen dose produced maximum grain yield.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- highest dose of foliar Ne0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In case of N levels, maximum grain yield was produced by treatments fertilized with highest dose of foliar N.”
t0“WHEAT”
The same questions in other papers
application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- positive
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.