Paper · 2011

Flowering and productivity of water melon cultivars in inter-generic grafting on nematode-resistant Cucumis seedling rootstocks in Meloidogyne-infested fields.

K. M. Pofu; P. W. Mashela; N. M. Mokgalong; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A new procedure for optimising stem diameters of highly nematode-susceptible watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) cultivars and highly nematode-resistant wild watermelon (Cucumis africanus) and wild cucumber (C. myriocarpus) seedlings indicated that the two genera had high inter-generic compatibility, with rootstocks retaining their ability to suppress the root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne species). A field study was initiated to determine the influence of inter-generic grafting in Citrullus cultivars onto Cucumis species on survival of inter-grafts, flowering, fruit yield and accumulation of essential nutrient elements under field conditions. At Week four after transplanting, Cucumis africanus and Cucumis myriocarpus rootstocks on cultivars ‘Congo’ and ‘Charleston Gray’ increased flowering by 70-81 % and 96-77 %, respectively. At harvest, 66 days after transplanting, Cucumis rootstocks on cultivars ‘Congo’ and ‘Charleston Gray’ reduced relative impact values by 92-93 % and 94-96 %, respectively; but increased fresh fruit yield by 46-60 % and 48-115 %, respectively; and dry shoot mass by 50-66% and 30-104%, respectively. Rootstocks had no effect on accumulation of essential nutrient elements except for manganese and zinc in leaves of scions. In conclusion, inter-generic grafting has the potential economic benefit on watermelon production, particularly in areas infested with Meloidogyne species, since there are no genotypes resistant to this nematode genus in watermelon cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two genera had high graft compatibility and rootstocks retained nematode suppression.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
Meloidogyne speciesMeloidogynee0other
Outcome
high inter-generic compatibilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two genera had high inter-generic compatibility, with rootstocks retaining their ability to suppress the root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne species)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–394 · show in text ↑
t0

“water melon cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumis rootstocks increased flowering of Congo and Charleston Gray at week four.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
‘Congo’ and ‘Charleston Gray’e0
Treatment
Cucumis africanus and Cucumis myriocarpus rootstockse0
Interactor
Cucumis africanusCucumis africanuse0other
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
70-81 % and 96-77 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis africanus
Cucumis africanus · InteractorRagnhild&Neil Crawford from Sweden · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Week four after transplanting, Cucumis africanus and Cucumis myriocarpus rootstocks on cultivars ‘Congo’ and ‘Charleston Gray’ increased flowering by 70-81 % and 96-77 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“water melon cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumis rootstocks reduced relative nematode impact in Congo and Charleston Gray.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Cucumist0
Interactor
MeloidogyneMeloidogynet0pathogene0
Outcome
relative impact valuese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
92-93 % and 94-96 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced relative impact values by 92-93 % and 94-96 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“water melon cultivars in inter-generic grafting on nematode-resistant Cucumis seedling rootstocks in Meloidogyne-infested fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumis rootstocks increased fresh fruit yield.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Cucumist0
Outcome
fresh fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
46-60 % and 48-115 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased fresh fruit yield by 46-60 % and 48-115 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“water melon cultivars in inter-generic grafting on nematode-resistant Cucumis seedling rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumis rootstocks increased dry shoot mass.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Cucumist0
Outcome
dry shoot masse0
Direction
increasede1
Value
50-66% and 30-104%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry shoot mass by 50-66% and 30-104%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“water melon cultivars in inter-generic grafting on nematode-resistant Cucumis seedling rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“but increased fresh fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks did not affect most essential nutrient accumulation, except manganese and zinc.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
leaves of scionse0
Treatment
Rootstockse0
Outcome
accumulation of essential nutrient elementse0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
except for manganese and zince0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rootstocks had no effect on accumulation of essential nutrient elements except for manganese and zinc in leaves of scions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“water melon cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that inter-generic grafting may economically benefit watermelon production in Meloidogyne-infested areas.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne speciesMeloidogynee0pathogen
Outcome
potential economic benefit on watermelon productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inter-generic grafting has the potential economic benefit on watermelon production, particularly in areas infested with Meloidogyne species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1409 · show in text ↑

Cucumis africanus · phenology · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Cucumis myriocarpus · phenology · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

grafting · phenology · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

grafting · nutrient: content · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.