Paper · 2009 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Efficacy of the Biofumigant Fungus Muscodor albus (Ascomycota: Xylariales) for Control of Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Simulated Storage Conditions

L. A. Lacey; D. R. Horton; D. C. Jones; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), a serious pest of pome fruit, is a threat to exportation of apples (Malus spp.) because of the possibility of shipping infested fruit. The need for alternatives to fumigants such as methyl bromide for quarantine security of exported fruit has encouraged the development of effective fumigants with reduced side effects. The endophytic fungus Muscodor albus Worapong, Strobel and Hess (Ascomycota: Xylariales) produces volatile compounds that are biocidal for several pest organisms, including plant pathogens and insect pests. The objectives of our research were to determine the effects of M. albus volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on codling moth adults, neonate larvae, larvae in infested apples, and diapausing cocooned larvae in simulated storage conditions. Fumigation of adult codling moth with VOCs produced by M. albus for 3 d and incubating in fresh air for 24 h at 25 degrees C resulted in 81% corrected mortality. Four- and 5-d exposures resulted in higher mortality (84 and 100%, respectively), but control mortality was also high due to the short life span of the moths. Exposure of neonate larvae to VOCs for 3 d on apples and incubating for 7 d resulted in 86% corrected mortality. Treated larvae were predominantly first instars, whereas 85% of control larvae developed to second and third instars. Exposure of apples that had been infested for 5 d, fumigated with M. albus VOCs for 3 d, and incubated as described above resulted in 71% corrected larval mortality. Exposure of diapausing cocooned codling moth larvae to VOCs for 7 or 14 d resulted in 31 and 100% mortality, respectively, with negligible control mortality. Our data on treatment of several stages of codling moth with M. albus VOCs indicate that the fungus could provide an alternative to broad spectrum chemical fumigants for codling moth control in storage and contribute to the systems approach to achieve quarantine security of exported apples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-day fungal volatile fumigation yielded 81% corrected mortality of adult codling moths.

Treatment
VOCs produced by M. albus for 3 de0
Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae0pest
Second interactor
M. albusMuscodor albuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
corrected mortalitye0
Value
81%e0
Qualifier
incubating in fresh air for 24 h at 25 degrees Ce0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Muscodor albus
Muscodor albus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation of adult codling moth with VOCs produced by M. albus for 3 d and incubating in fresh air for 24 h at 25 degrees C resulted in 81% corrected mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“apples (Malus spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four-day exposure produced 84% adult codling moth mortality, with high control mortality.

Treatment
Four- and 5-d exposurese0
Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae2pest
Second interactor
M. albusMuscodor albuse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
84e0
Qualifier
control mortality was also highe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Muscodor albus
Muscodor albus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four- and 5-d exposures resulted in higher mortality (84 and 100%, respectively), but control mortality was also high due to the short life span of the moths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“apples (Malus spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fumigation of adult codling moth with VOCs produced by M. albus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-day exposure produced 100% adult codling moth mortality, with high control mortality.

Treatment
5-d exposurese0
Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae2pest
Second interactor
M. albusMuscodor albuse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
control mortality was also highe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Muscodor albus
Muscodor albus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four- and 5-d exposures resulted in higher mortality (84 and 100%, respectively), but control mortality was also high due to the short life span of the moths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“apples (Malus spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fumigation of adult codling moth with VOCs produced by M. albus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-day exposure of neonate larvae on apples yielded 86% corrected mortality.

Treatment
VOCs for 3 de0
Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae1pest
Second interactor
M. albusMuscodor albuse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
corrected mortalitye0
Value
86%e0
Qualifier
incubating for 7 de0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Muscodor albus
Muscodor albus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of neonate larvae to VOCs for 3 d on apples and incubating for 7 d resulted in 86% corrected mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1260 · show in text ↑
e1

“Codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
e2

“M. albus volatile organic compounds (VOCs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated larvae remained predominantly first instars, whereas 85% of controls reached second or third instars.

Treatment
Treated larvaee0
Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae2pest
Second interactor
M. albusMuscodor albuse3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
predominantly first instarse0
Qualifier
85% of control larvae developed to second and third instarse0
Comparator
control larvaee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Muscodor albus
Muscodor albus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated larvae were predominantly first instars, whereas 85% of control larvae developed to second and third instars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1378 · show in text ↑
e1

“apples (Malus spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“Codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
e3

“M. albus volatile organic compounds (VOCs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation of infested apples produced 71% corrected codling moth larval mortality.

Treatment
fumigated with M. albus VOCs for 3 de0
Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae1pest
Second interactor
M. albusMuscodor albuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
larval mortalitye0
Value
71%e0
Qualifier
infested for 5 de0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Muscodor albus
Muscodor albus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of apples that had been infested for 5 d, fumigated with M. albus VOCs for 3 d, and incubated as described above resulted in 71% corrected larval mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1544 · show in text ↑
e1

“Codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven-day volatile exposure produced 31% mortality in diapausing cocooned larvae.

Treatment
VOCs for 7 or 14 de0
Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae0pest
Second interactor
M. albusMuscodor albuse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mortalitye0
Value
31e0
Qualifier
negligible control mortalitye0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Muscodor albus
Muscodor albus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of diapausing cocooned codling moth larvae to VOCs for 7 or 14 d resulted in 31 and 100% mortality, respectively, with negligible control mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1702 · show in text ↑
e1

“apples (Malus spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“M. albus volatile organic compounds (VOCs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen-day volatile exposure produced 100% mortality in diapausing cocooned larvae.

Treatment
VOCs for 7 or 14 de0
Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae0pest
Second interactor
M. albusMuscodor albuse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mortalitye0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
negligible control mortalitye0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Muscodor albus
Muscodor albus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of diapausing cocooned codling moth larvae to VOCs for 7 or 14 d resulted in 31 and 100% mortality, respectively, with negligible control mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1702 · show in text ↑
e1

“apples (Malus spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“M. albus volatile organic compounds (VOCs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–696 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose M. albus volatiles as an alternative fumigant for codling moth control and quarantine security of exported apples.

Interactor
codling mothCydia pomonellae0pest
Second interactor
M. albusMuscodor albuse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
an alternative to broad spectrum chemical fumigants for codling moth control in storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonella · InteractorSimon Winkley & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Muscodor albus
Muscodor albus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungus could provide an alternative to broad spectrum chemical fumigants for codling moth control in storage and contribute to the systems approach to achieve quarantine security of exported apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1994 · show in text ↑
e1

“fumigated with M. albus VOCs for 3 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1467 · show in text ↑

solarization · Cydia pomonella · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.