Paper · 2004 · Nutrition & Food Science

Contents and digestibility of carbohydrates of ricebean and fababean as affected by simple inexpensive processing methods

K. Saharan; N. Khetarpaul; S. Bishnoi

16
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ricebean (RB‐32) contained significantly ( p < 0.05) higher amounts of total soluble (5.6g/100g) and non‐reducing sugars (5.0g/100g) than fababean (VH‐82‐1). On the other hand, the contents of starch and reducing sugars were more in fababean (53.2g/100g; 608.7mg/100g) than those in ricebean (50.7g/100g; 547.3mg/100g). The starch digestibility (mg maltose released/g meal) of whole raw seeds and husk of ricebean and fababean was 30.8; 6.3 and 42.1; 6.3, respectively. Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean. Germination for 24 hours in ricebean and 48 hours in fababean was found to be the best as it could improve the starch digestibility to the extent of 100 to 90 per cent over the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ricebean had higher total soluble sugars than fababean.

Taxon
RicebeanVigna umbellatae0
Material
RB‐32e0
Outcome
total solublee0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.6g/100ge0
Comparator
fababeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna umbellata
Vigna umbellata · TaxonSamuel Wong · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ricebean (RB‐32) contained significantly ( p < 0.05) higher amounts of total soluble (5.6g/100g) and non‐reducing sugars (5.0g/100g) than fababean (VH‐82‐1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ricebean had higher non-reducing sugars than fababean.

Taxon
RicebeanVigna umbellatae0
Material
RB‐32e0
Outcome
non‐reducing sugarse0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.0g/100ge0
Comparator
fababeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna umbellata
Vigna umbellata · TaxonSamuel Wong · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ricebean (RB‐32) contained significantly ( p < 0.05) higher amounts of total soluble (5.6g/100g) and non‐reducing sugars (5.0g/100g) than fababean (VH‐82‐1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fababean had more starch than ricebean.

Taxon
fababeanVicia fabae0
Outcome
starche0
Direction
moree0
Value
53.2g/100ge0
Qualifier
50.7g/100ge0
Comparator
ricebeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of starch and reducing sugars were more in fababean (53.2g/100g; 608.7mg/100g) than those in ricebean (50.7g/100g; 547.3mg/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fababean had more reducing sugars than ricebean.

Taxon
fababeanVicia fabae0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Direction
moree0
Value
608.7mg/100ge0
Qualifier
547.3mg/100ge0
Comparator
ricebeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of starch and reducing sugars were more in fababean (53.2g/100g; 608.7mg/100g) than those in ricebean (50.7g/100g; 547.3mg/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw ricebean seeds had starch digestibility of 30.8 mg maltose released per g meal.

Taxon
ricebeanVigna umbellatae0
Organ / stage
whole raw seedse0
Outcome
starch digestibilitye0
Value
30.8e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna umbellata
Vigna umbellata · TaxonSamuel Wong · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The starch digestibility (mg maltose released/g meal) of whole raw seeds and husk of ricebean and fababean was 30.8; 6.3 and 42.1; 6.3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–468 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ricebean husk starch digestibility was 6.3 mg maltose released per g meal.

Taxon
ricebeanVigna umbellatae0
Organ / stage
huske0
Outcome
starch digestibilitye0
Value
6.3e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna umbellata
Vigna umbellata · TaxonSamuel Wong · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The starch digestibility (mg maltose released/g meal) of whole raw seeds and husk of ricebean and fababean was 30.8; 6.3 and 42.1; 6.3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–468 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw fababean seed starch digestibility was 42.1 mg maltose released per g meal.

Taxon
fababeanVicia fabae0
Organ / stage
whole raw seedse0
Outcome
starch digestibilitye0
Value
42.1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The starch digestibility (mg maltose released/g meal) of whole raw seeds and husk of ricebean and fababean was 30.8; 6.3 and 42.1; 6.3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–468 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fababean husk starch digestibility was 6.3 mg maltose released per g meal.

Taxon
fababeanVicia fabae0
Organ / stage
huske0
Outcome
starch digestibilitye0
Value
6.3e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The starch digestibility (mg maltose released/g meal) of whole raw seeds and husk of ricebean and fababean was 30.8; 6.3 and 42.1; 6.3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking improved ricebean starch digestibility.

Taxon
ricebeanVigna umbellatae0
Treatment
soakinge0
Outcome
in vitro starch digestibilitye0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna umbellata
Vigna umbellata · TaxonSamuel Wong · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprouting improved ricebean starch digestibility.

Taxon
ricebeanVigna umbellatae0
Treatment
sproutinge0
Outcome
in vitro starch digestibilitye0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna umbellata
Vigna umbellata · TaxonSamuel Wong · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehulling improved ricebean starch digestibility.

Taxon
ricebeanVigna umbellatae0
Treatment
dehullinge0
Outcome
in vitro starch digestibilitye0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna umbellata
Vigna umbellata · TaxonSamuel Wong · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking improved fababean starch digestibility.

Taxon
fababeanVicia fabae0
Treatment
soakinge0
Outcome
in vitro starch digestibilitye0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprouting improved fababean starch digestibility.

Taxon
fababeanVicia fabae0
Treatment
sproutinge0
Outcome
in vitro starch digestibilitye0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehulling improved fababean starch digestibility.

Taxon
fababeanVicia fabae0
Treatment
dehullinge0
Outcome
in vitro starch digestibilitye0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination for 24 hours best improved ricebean starch digestibility, by 100 percent over control.

Taxon
ricebeanVigna umbellatae0
Treatment
Germination for 24 hourse0
Outcome
starch digestibilitye0
Direction
improvee0
Value
100e0
Qualifier
per cente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna umbellata
Vigna umbellata · TaxonSamuel Wong · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination for 24 hours in ricebean and 48 hours in fababean was found to be the best as it could improve the starch digestibility to the extent of 100 to 90 per cent over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination for 48 hours best improved fababean starch digestibility, by 90 percent over control.

Taxon
fababeanVicia fabae0
Treatment
48 hourse0
Outcome
starch digestibilitye0
Direction
improvee0
Value
90e0
Qualifier
per cente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination for 24 hours in ricebean and 48 hours in fababean was found to be the best as it could improve the starch digestibility to the extent of 100 to 90 per cent over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–806 · show in text ↑

application · quality: sugar starch · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.