Abstract
Ricebean (RB‐32) contained significantly ( p < 0.05) higher amounts of total soluble (5.6g/100g) and non‐reducing sugars (5.0g/100g) than fababean (VH‐82‐1). On the other hand, the contents of starch and reducing sugars were more in fababean (53.2g/100g; 608.7mg/100g) than those in ricebean (50.7g/100g; 547.3mg/100g). The starch digestibility (mg maltose released/g meal) of whole raw seeds and husk of ricebean and fababean was 30.8; 6.3 and 42.1; 6.3, respectively. Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean. Germination for 24 hours in ricebean and 48 hours in fababean was found to be the best as it could improve the starch digestibility to the extent of 100 to 90 per cent over the control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Ricebean had higher total soluble sugars than fababean.
- Taxon
- Ricebean
Vigna umbellatae0 - Material
- RB‐32e0
- Outcome
- total solublee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 5.6g/100ge0
- Comparator
- fababeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Ricebean (RB‐32) contained significantly ( p < 0.05) higher amounts of total soluble (5.6g/100g) and non‐reducing sugars (5.0g/100g) than fababean (VH‐82‐1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ricebean had higher non-reducing sugars than fababean.
- Taxon
- Ricebean
Vigna umbellatae0 - Material
- RB‐32e0
- Outcome
- non‐reducing sugarse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 5.0g/100ge0
- Comparator
- fababeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Ricebean (RB‐32) contained significantly ( p < 0.05) higher amounts of total soluble (5.6g/100g) and non‐reducing sugars (5.0g/100g) than fababean (VH‐82‐1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fababean had more starch than ricebean.
- Taxon
- fababean
Vicia fabae0 - Outcome
- starche0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 53.2g/100ge0
- Qualifier
- 50.7g/100ge0
- Comparator
- ricebeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the contents of starch and reducing sugars were more in fababean (53.2g/100g; 608.7mg/100g) than those in ricebean (50.7g/100g; 547.3mg/100g)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fababean had more reducing sugars than ricebean.
- Taxon
- fababean
Vicia fabae0 - Outcome
- reducing sugarse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 608.7mg/100ge0
- Qualifier
- 547.3mg/100ge0
- Comparator
- ricebeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the contents of starch and reducing sugars were more in fababean (53.2g/100g; 608.7mg/100g) than those in ricebean (50.7g/100g; 547.3mg/100g)”
Claim · model-written summary
Raw ricebean seeds had starch digestibility of 30.8 mg maltose released per g meal.
- Taxon
- ricebean
Vigna umbellatae0 - Organ / stage
- whole raw seedse0
- Outcome
- starch digestibilitye0
- Value
- 30.8e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The starch digestibility (mg maltose released/g meal) of whole raw seeds and husk of ricebean and fababean was 30.8; 6.3 and 42.1; 6.3, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Ricebean husk starch digestibility was 6.3 mg maltose released per g meal.
- Taxon
- ricebean
Vigna umbellatae0 - Organ / stage
- huske0
- Outcome
- starch digestibilitye0
- Value
- 6.3e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The starch digestibility (mg maltose released/g meal) of whole raw seeds and husk of ricebean and fababean was 30.8; 6.3 and 42.1; 6.3, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Raw fababean seed starch digestibility was 42.1 mg maltose released per g meal.
- Taxon
- fababean
Vicia fabae0 - Organ / stage
- whole raw seedse0
- Outcome
- starch digestibilitye0
- Value
- 42.1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The starch digestibility (mg maltose released/g meal) of whole raw seeds and husk of ricebean and fababean was 30.8; 6.3 and 42.1; 6.3, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Fababean husk starch digestibility was 6.3 mg maltose released per g meal.
- Taxon
- fababean
Vicia fabae0 - Organ / stage
- huske0
- Outcome
- starch digestibilitye0
- Value
- 6.3e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The starch digestibility (mg maltose released/g meal) of whole raw seeds and husk of ricebean and fababean was 30.8; 6.3 and 42.1; 6.3, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Soaking improved ricebean starch digestibility.
- Taxon
- ricebean
Vigna umbellatae0 - Treatment
- soakinge0
- Outcome
- in vitro starch digestibilitye0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprouting improved ricebean starch digestibility.
- Taxon
- ricebean
Vigna umbellatae0 - Treatment
- sproutinge0
- Outcome
- in vitro starch digestibilitye0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”
Claim · model-written summary
Dehulling improved ricebean starch digestibility.
- Taxon
- ricebean
Vigna umbellatae0 - Treatment
- dehullinge0
- Outcome
- in vitro starch digestibilitye0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”
Claim · model-written summary
Soaking improved fababean starch digestibility.
- Taxon
- fababean
Vicia fabae0 - Treatment
- soakinge0
- Outcome
- in vitro starch digestibilitye0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprouting improved fababean starch digestibility.
- Taxon
- fababean
Vicia fabae0 - Treatment
- sproutinge0
- Outcome
- in vitro starch digestibilitye0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”
Claim · model-written summary
Dehulling improved fababean starch digestibility.
- Taxon
- fababean
Vicia fabae0 - Treatment
- dehullinge0
- Outcome
- in vitro starch digestibilitye0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Due to soaking, sprouting and dehulling, a significant ( p < 0.05) improvement occurred in in vitro starch digestibility of both ricebean and fababean”
Claim · model-written summary
Germination for 24 hours best improved ricebean starch digestibility, by 100 percent over control.
- Taxon
- ricebean
Vigna umbellatae0 - Treatment
- Germination for 24 hourse0
- Outcome
- starch digestibilitye0
- Direction
- improvee0
- Value
- 100e0
- Qualifier
- per cente0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Germination for 24 hours in ricebean and 48 hours in fababean was found to be the best as it could improve the starch digestibility to the extent of 100 to 90 per cent over the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Germination for 48 hours best improved fababean starch digestibility, by 90 percent over control.
- Taxon
- fababean
Vicia fabae0 - Treatment
- 48 hourse0
- Outcome
- starch digestibilitye0
- Direction
- improvee0
- Value
- 90e0
- Qualifier
- per cente0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Germination for 24 hours in ricebean and 48 hours in fababean was found to be the best as it could improve the starch digestibility to the extent of 100 to 90 per cent over the control”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: sugar starch · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.