Paper · 2014 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

How does grafting affect the ionome of cherry tomato plants under water stress?

E. Sánchez-Rodríguez; R. Leyva; C. Constán-Aguilar; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
51
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The response of grafted vegetables to stress conditions owing to the nutrient status may be different than that of self-rooted plants, depending mainly on the rootstock genotype.The aim of the present work is to determine the response of reciprocal grafts made between cherry tomato cultivars (Solanum lycopersicum) to moderate water stress, examining uptake and concentration of nutrient.The tomato cultivars Zarina (drought-tolerant) and Josefina (drought-sensitive) were reciprocal grafted and selfgrafted, and ungrafted were used as control.The total content and uptake fluxes of macro-and micronutrients were determined in leaves.Our results show that the use of drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstocks (ZarxJos) showed improve ionome, with increases in nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentration and uptake fluxes, and an increase in iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) concentration and uptake under water stress.Besides, the vigorous root system of rootstocks is often capable of absorbing plant nutrients more efficently than scion root, and we have showed that cv.Zarina and ZarxJos develop a better radicular system.This result confirms the hypothesis that grafted plants on vigorous rootstocks can improve mineral nutrition and nutrient uptake with respect to ungrafted plants, especially under water stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zarina rootstock increased leaf nitrogen concentration and uptake flux under water stress.

Material
ZarxJose0
Treatment
drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstockse0
Outcome
nitrogen (N)e0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstocks (ZarxJos) showed improve ionome, with increases in nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentration and uptake fluxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zarina rootstock increased leaf phosphorus concentration and uptake flux under water stress.

Material
ZarxJose0
Treatment
drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstockse0
Outcome
phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentration and uptake fluxese0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstocks (ZarxJos) showed improve ionome, with increases in nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentration and uptake fluxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zarina rootstock increased leaf potassium concentration and uptake flux under water stress.

Material
ZarxJose0
Treatment
drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstockse0
Outcome
potassium (K) concentration and uptake fluxese0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstocks (ZarxJos) showed improve ionome, with increases in nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentration and uptake fluxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zarina rootstock increased leaf iron concentration and uptake under water stress.

Material
ZarxJose0
Treatment
drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstockse0
Outcome
iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) concentration and uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
under water stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstocks (ZarxJos) showed improve ionome, with increases in nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentration and uptake fluxes, and an increase in iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) concentration and uptake under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zarina rootstock increased leaf copper concentration and uptake under water stress.

Material
ZarxJose0
Treatment
drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstockse0
Outcome
copper (Cu) concentration and uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
under water stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of drought-tolerant cv.Zarina like rootstocks (ZarxJos) showed improve ionome, with increases in nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentration and uptake fluxes, and an increase in iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) concentration and uptake under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zarina and ZarxJos developed a better root system.

Material
cv.Zarina and ZarxJose0
Outcome
better radicular systeme0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cv.Zarina and ZarxJos develop a better radicular system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 · show in text ↑

drought · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

grafting · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.