Abstract

Alternatives to sulfur dioxide to maintain quality of table grapes, including various combinations of rachis removal, chlorinated wash, hot water treatment, and modified atmosphere packaging, were explored in this study. Grapes were prepared by cutting off the rachis 1 to 2 mm from the fruit or by keeping the clusters intact. After initial preparation, short-stem and cluster grapes were subjected to chlorinated wash and/or hot water (45 °C, 8 min) treatment and packaged in plastic trays sealed with a gas-permeable film. The treated grapes as well as the commercially packed grapes (COM) in their original packages were stored at 5 °C for up to 4 weeks. Hot water treatment resulted in significantly ( P < 0.05) higher oxygen retention and lower carbon dioxide accumulation in package headspaces, maintained a firmer texture, higher overall visual quality, lower decay rate, and lower microbial populations than other treatments or COM during the entire storage period. Grapes that were cut from the rachis and treated with hot water and chlorine maintained the highest quality for 4 weeks with the least decay among all treatments. A chlorine prewash treatment significantly ( P < 0.05) reduced microbial populations on cluster grapes and maintained better overall quality. Conventional COM grapes developed dark decay and lost turgidity and were of unacceptable quality at 28 days of storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment gave higher oxygen retention in package headspaces than other treatments or commercial packs.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
Hot water treatmente0
Outcome
oxygen retentione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatments or COMe0

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hot water treatment resulted in significantly ( P < 0.05) higher oxygen retention and lower carbon dioxide accumulation in package headspaces, maintained a firmer texture, higher overall visual quality, lower decay rate, and lower microbial populations than other treatments or COM during the entire storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment gave lower carbon dioxide accumulation in package headspaces than other treatments or commercial packs.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
Hot water treatmente0
Outcome
carbon dioxide accumulatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatments or COMe0

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hot water treatment resulted in significantly ( P < 0.05) higher oxygen retention and lower carbon dioxide accumulation in package headspaces, maintained a firmer texture, higher overall visual quality, lower decay rate, and lower microbial populations than other treatments or COM during the entire storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment maintained a firmer texture of table grapes than other treatments or commercial packs.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
Hot water treatmente0
Outcome
texturee0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
other treatments or COMe0

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hot water treatment resulted in significantly ( P < 0.05) higher oxygen retention and lower carbon dioxide accumulation in package headspaces, maintained a firmer texture, higher overall visual quality, lower decay rate, and lower microbial populations than other treatments or COM during the entire storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment gave higher overall visual quality than other treatments or commercial packs.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
Hot water treatmente0
Outcome
overall visual qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatments or COMe0

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hot water treatment resulted in significantly ( P < 0.05) higher oxygen retention and lower carbon dioxide accumulation in package headspaces, maintained a firmer texture, higher overall visual quality, lower decay rate, and lower microbial populations than other treatments or COM during the entire storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment gave lower decay rate than other treatments or commercial packs.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
Hot water treatmente0
Outcome
decay ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatments or COMe0

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hot water treatment resulted in significantly ( P < 0.05) higher oxygen retention and lower carbon dioxide accumulation in package headspaces, maintained a firmer texture, higher overall visual quality, lower decay rate, and lower microbial populations than other treatments or COM during the entire storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment gave lower microbial populations than other treatments or commercial packs.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
Hot water treatmente0
Outcome
microbial populationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatments or COMe0

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hot water treatment resulted in significantly ( P < 0.05) higher oxygen retention and lower carbon dioxide accumulation in package headspaces, maintained a firmer texture, higher overall visual quality, lower decay rate, and lower microbial populations than other treatments or COM during the entire storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grapes cut from the rachis and treated with hot water and chlorine maintained the highest quality for 4 weeks with the least decay.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
treated with hot water and chlorinee1
Outcome
qualitye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4 weekse1
Comparator
all treatmentse1

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grapes that were cut from the rachis and treated with hot water and chlorine maintained the highest quality for 4 weeks with the least decay among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A chlorine prewash significantly reduced microbial populations on cluster grapes.

Taxon
table grapest0
Organ / stage
cluster grapese2
Treatment
A chlorine prewash treatmente2
Outcome
microbial populationse2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“A chlorine prewash treatment significantly ( P < 0.05) reduced microbial populations on cluster grapes and maintained better overall quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A chlorine prewash maintained better overall quality of cluster grapes.

Taxon
table grapest0
Organ / stage
cluster grapese2
Treatment
A chlorine prewash treatmente2
Outcome
overall qualitye2
Direction
bettere2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“A chlorine prewash treatment significantly ( P < 0.05) reduced microbial populations on cluster grapes and maintained better overall quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1278 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional commercially packed grapes developed dark decay and lost turgidity during storage.

Taxon
table grapest0
Material
Conventional COM grapese3
Outcome
dark decay and lost turgiditye3

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Conventional COM grapes developed dark decay and lost turgidity and were of unacceptable quality at 28 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional COM grapes were of unacceptable quality at 28 days of storage.

Taxon
table grapest0
Material
Conventional COM grapese3
Outcome
unacceptable qualitye3
Value
28 dayse3

Verbatim

t0

“Hot Water Treatment in Combination with Rachis Removal and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Maintains Quality of Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Conventional COM grapes developed dark decay and lost turgidity and were of unacceptable quality at 28 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1398 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

heat · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

heat · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

heat · quality: general · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.