Paper · 2011 · Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference

Concentrated lowvolume aerial sprays to improve spray distribution in large avocado trees

R.E. Gaskin; K.D. Steele; G.S. Elliott

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The avocado industry has comprehensive guidelines for groundbased spray application to avocado orchards but there are no current guidelines for aerial spray applications Helicopterapplied deposits from a dilute spray application (600 litres/ha) of copper on a commercial Hass avocado orchard (12 m tall trees) were compared with twotimes (300 litres/ha) and threetimes (200 litres/ha) concentrate sprays with addition of varying rates of the superspreader adjuvant DuWett Tartrazine dye was included as a deposit tracer Concentrate sprays with adjuvant addition consistently gave higher spray deposits on difficulttowet fruit than the dilute aerial spray Deposits on fruit in all canopy zones were increased with concentrate sprays but particularly in the upper lower and outer canopy zones On foliage concentrate sprays with adjuvant addition gave similar spray deposits to the dilute spray Leaves in mid and inner canopy zones tended to be less well targeted by concentrate sprays This must be considered if targeting dense trees with aerial sprays

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrate sprays with adjuvant deposited more spray on difficult-to-wet avocado fruit than dilute aerial spray.

Taxon
avocadoPersea americanae1
Treatment
Concentrate sprays with adjuvant additione0
Outcome
spray deposits on difficulttowet fruite0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dilute aerial spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrate sprays with adjuvant addition consistently gave higher spray deposits on difficulttowet fruit than the dilute aerial spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial Hass avocado orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrate sprays increased fruit deposits across canopy zones, especially upper, lower and outer zones.

Taxon
avocadoPersea americanae1
Treatment
concentrate sprayse0
Outcome
Deposits on fruite0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
upper lower and outer canopy zonese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deposits on fruit in all canopy zones were increased with concentrate sprays but particularly in the upper lower and outer canopy zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–790 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial Hass avocado orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage deposits from concentrate sprays with adjuvant were similar to dilute spray deposits.

Taxon
avocadoPersea americanae1
Organ / stage
foliagee0
Treatment
concentrate sprays with adjuvant additione0
Outcome
spray depositse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
dilute spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On foliage concentrate sprays with adjuvant addition gave similar spray deposits to the dilute spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–891 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial Hass avocado orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrate sprays tended to target mid and inner canopy leaves less well.

Taxon
avocadoPersea americanae1
Treatment
concentrate sprayse0
Outcome
Leaves in mid and inner canopy zonese0
Direction
less well targetede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves in mid and inner canopy zones tended to be less well targeted by concentrate sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial Hass avocado orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–291 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise considering poor coverage of inner and mid canopy leaves when aerially spraying dense trees.

Taxon
avocadoPersea americanae1
Outcome
This must be considered if targeting dense trees with aerial sprayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves in mid and inner canopy zones tended to be less well targeted by concentrate sprays This must be considered if targeting dense trees with aerial sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial Hass avocado orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–291 · show in text ↑

application · growth · Persea americana (avocado)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.