Paper · 2007 · International Journal of Fruit Science

The Effects of Crown Removal, Short Days and Polyethylene Mulch Color on Fruit Yield Parameters and Quality Compounds, in Tunnel-Grown ‘Korona’ Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.)

Rolf Nestby; Mikko Anttonen; Michel Verheul; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of exposing strawberry plants to a short-day treatment (10 h day-1) from August 10 to September 17, and reducing the crown number per plant in the following spring were examined on fruit yield and quality in Haygrow® (UK) tunnel-grown strawberries. Reducing the number of crowns per plant increased °Brix level and reduced fruit yield. The yield reduction was lower than the reduction in crown number should account for, mainly because the number of fruits per crown was higher on plants with reduced crown number than on multicrown (MC) plants. Short-day treatment increased yield by 10% in MC plants compared with plants grown under ambient light, but the length of the photoperiod had no effect on quality compounds irrespective of crown number. However, for fruit size there was a significant interaction between day-length and crown number, expressed as increased fruit size of plants under ambient light conditions and no effect on short-day plants owing to reduced crown number. There were no interactions between other experimental factors on the characters in question here.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing crowns per strawberry plant increased fruit °Brix.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Reducing the number of crowns per plante0
Outcome
°Brix levele0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing the number of crowns per plant increased °Brix level and reduced fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing crowns per strawberry plant reduced fruit yield.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Reducing the number of crowns per plante0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing the number of crowns per plant increased °Brix level and reduced fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fruit yield reduction was smaller than expected from the reduction in crown number.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield reduction was lower than the reduction in crown number should account for”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants with fewer crowns bore more fruits per crown than multicrown plants.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
reduced crown numbere0
Outcome
number of fruits per crowne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
multicrown (MC) plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of fruits per crown was higher on plants with reduced crown number than on multicrown (MC) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short days increased yield by 10% in multicrown plants relative to ambient light.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
MC plantse0
Treatment
Short-day treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
plants grown under ambient lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Short-day treatment increased yield by 10% in MC plants compared with plants grown under ambient light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoperiod length had no effect on quality compounds regardless of crown number.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
length of the photoperiode0
Outcome
quality compoundse0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
irrespective of crown numbere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the length of the photoperiod had no effect on quality compounds irrespective of crown number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown reduction increased fruit size under ambient light.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
reduced crown numbere0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
ambient light conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased fruit size of plants under ambient light conditions and no effect on short-day plants owing to reduced crown number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown reduction had no effect on fruit size under short days.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
reduced crown numbere0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
short-day plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased fruit size of plants under ambient light conditions and no effect on short-day plants owing to reduced crown number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining experimental factors showed no interactions for the measured characters.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
no interactions between other experimental factors on the characters in question heree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no interactions between other experimental factors on the characters in question here.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–179 · show in text ↑

crown compound · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

light · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

61 papers: 46 positive, 15 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

light · quality: general · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.